Microsoft Boo-Hoos Yahoo
|
News Analysis. Three months of waiting was enough. Microsoft has withdrawn its unsolicited bid for Yahoo. |
But Microsoft isn't going away gladly. For days, the company prepared for the possibility of withdrawal by placing blame on Yahoo. In an interesting power play, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer largely blamed a rumored Google-Yahoo search outsourcing deal as a major reason for the offer's withdrawal.
"We regard with particular concern your apparent planning to respond to a hostile bid by pursuing a new arrangement that would involve or lead to the outsourcing to Google of key paid Internet search terms offered by Yahoo! today," Steve wrote in a letter addressed to Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang.
Rumors spread later this week about a long-term ad/search deal between Google and Yahoo, following early conclusion of a two-week test.
"Your apparent plan to pursue such an arrangement in the event of a proxy contest or exchange offer leads me to the firm decision not to pursue such a path. Instead, I hereby formally withdraw Microsoft's proposal to acquire Yahoo!," wrote Microsoft's CEO.
As widely rumored later in the week, Microsoft was ready to raise its offer:
"In our conversations this week, we conveyed our willingness to raise our offer to $33 per share, reflecting again our belief in this collective opportunity. This increase would have added approximately another $5 billion of value to your shareholders, compared to the current value of our initial offer. It also would have reflected a premium of over 70 percent compared to the price at which your stock closed on January 31. Yet it has proven insufficient, as your final position insisted on Microsoft paying yet another $5 billion or more, or at least another $4 per share above our $33 offer."
A closer reading of the letter indicates that Yahoo wanted more money ($37 a share). I suspect the talks collapsed more because of money than any Yahoo-Google deal. But it's great FUD.
The letter is a masterpiece of PR damage control. Steve comes across as the aggrieved, injured party, who looked out for the best of Yahoo's shareholders. His speechwriter deserves a raise. Let's not forget that Microsoft initiated this process with an unsolicited bid that Yahoo's board rejected.
Microsoft could have gone to shareholders, and commentary about the merger proposal anticipated such action. But no:
"After giving this week's conversations further thought, it is clear to me that it is not sensible for Microsoft to take our offer directly to your shareholders. This approach would necessarily involve a protracted proxy contest and eventually an exchange offer. Our discussions with you have led us to conclude that, in the interim, you would take steps that would make Yahoo! undesirable as an acquisition for Microsoft."
Steve doesn't specify what those steps might be. But the accusation is clear enough: The bid withdrawal is the fault of Yahoo's board. It's a nice bit of blame shifting that Microsoft could later use should some shareholders revolt and file lawsuits against the board.
The letter asserts how much Microsoft wanted the deal:
"I still believe even today that our offer remains the only alternative put forward that provides your stockholders full and fair value for their shares. By failing to reach an agreement with us, you and your stockholders have left significant value on the table."
The letter, which I again must call a masterpiece, is really for Yahoo shareholders. It effectively:
- Blames Jerry and his board members for the merger's failure (opportunity become failure is the characterization).
- Puts a higher offer on the table and insinuates that Microsoft could reconsider the offer under the right circumstances.
- Explains the most important circumstances for a deal to take placecessation of any ad/search deal with Google and quick acceptance of any offer.
Without a proxy fight, Ballmer still has made Microsoft's case to Yahoo shareholders. How will they respond? What happens to Yahoo's stock now? We'll know come Monday. I expect that the bid withdrawal will leave Yahoo in shambles, at least for a while, as shareholders and Wall Street react.
For Microsoft, Steve made the right decision; it's the one I asked him to make two days ago.


Comments (7)
Joe i'm simply pointing out how Portuno called the first half of this Daily-Double way back on February 17th, now all that Microsoft has to do is settle with VCSY and we'll have a WINNER!
http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_M/threadview?m=tm&bn=12004&tid=1348011&mid=1348015&tof=5&rt=2&frt=1&off=1
Microsoft probably won't offer more for Yahoo because they really don't want to own Yahoo. I think we'll see Microsoft abruptly shift gears and settle with VCSY. That will (Ballmer hopes - I don't know if Wade will provide one) bring a license for 744/521 to Microsoft and MSFT's applications and platform inventory can then be made internet-powered and Yahoo will be washed away unless they've been working with evaluation versions of 744/521 all this time.
As long as Microsoft does not settle, they will not be able to use any development work that uses 744/521 claims. When Microsoft settles, the agreement will probably allow MSFT to begin using whatever 744/521 related development they have in the shadows to be used immediately.
So the risk Microsoft is taking is that 744/521 are in the hands of the Googles and Yahoos of the world for evaluation and they've been using that to develope their systems and one day they will be allowed by VCSY to begin using the patents for commercial work before Microsoft gets that chance.
Either way, Microsoft will likely let the Yahoo bid fail so they can claim they're being abused then settle with VCSY and miraculously derive some incredible internet-enabled applications.
Ballmer would then look like a genius (even though he would show clearly he's a crook) and the softees in the world will elect him to be CEO for the next twenty years.
Oh well, who cares. It's only money.
Posted by I-Man | May 3, 2008 10:49 PM
joe, find a way to get this VCSY non-sense off of here. Its a serious deterrent to reading comments below your story.
Posted by uhura | May 4, 2008 12:33 AM
Joe threatened to ban I-man if he kept up the VCSY spam and it's clear that he can't resist posting more.
Posted by Mike | May 4, 2008 4:26 AM
Actually, the current I-man post is relevant to the article subject. He's right. I laid out why Microsoft was going after Yahoo. I laid how how Yahoo suddenly went from "can't" to "can" and they mashed the pedal and powered away from what Microsoft could do on the web.
Yahoo is worth more to their shareholders now than they were six months ago. Ballmer failed to factor that in. He thought the entire battle was with one small faction of the industry. But, I think Ballmer knows just how well-arrayed the industry is against Microsoft making headway on the web.
Microsoft is dead in the water now. No compelling architecture. No compelling technology. No compelling direction. No compelling reason for growth from their legacy position into something new.
If you folks don't want to know what's going on in the industry (and that includes all things great and small) why don't you simply hide your eyes as they glide past the posts. There are plenty of you out there that want the issue to go away but which way it "goes away" is for the court to answer. Not you.
Posted by portuno | May 4, 2008 11:52 AM
Anyone who invests in I-Man's so called advice is a fool. I don't really give a crap if MS settles with that trash company or not. Its a OTC penny stock that is not governed by SEC rules. BE CAREFUL!
I think that this deal falling through on Yahoo! is actually beneficial to MS. The money is better spent elsewhere.
Posted by JM | May 4, 2008 12:23 PM
"Its a OTC penny stock that is not governed by SEC rules. BE CAREFUL!"
Actually, YOU should be careful spreading false information about OTC stocks. What you're doing on a public message forum is libeling a class of regulated securities sensitive about being demeaned and libeled.
Posted by portuno | May 4, 2008 10:33 PM
f*ck VCSY
how's that for libel
Posted by Sam | May 5, 2008 6:36 PM