eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
February 26, 2009 4:25 PM

Yahoo Remodels the House Jerry and Terry Built



News Analysis. Bottom-line management might seem good to new Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz. She had better quickly learn about the importance of "feel-good branding" for Yahoo.

Her hard-line approach continued today, as Carol begins the process of remolding Yahoo into something different. In a Feb. 26 blog post titled "Getting our house in order," she writes about changes. Strangely, she didn't mention the imminent departure of Chief Financial Officer Blake Jorgensen, which was announced shortly before her blog was posted. Changing CFOs, in modeling analogies, is akin to knocking down a couple of walls. Say, Carol, while you're cleaning up the house, do remember not to throw out the baby with the bath water.

Six weeks ago, Jan. 14, I described Carol's appointment to the chief executive's office as "the end of Yahoo as we know it." My position then: Carol's credentials are all wrong for Yahoo, unless the company is planning a major makeover. Well, the makeover has started, and her credentials probably are all wrong. She seems ready to dismantle big portions of Yahoo, and in process risk its most valuable asset: the feel-good brand.

In November 2008, when returning to the topic of whether or not Microsoft should buy part or all of Yahoo, I offered the reason that made most sense: Yahoo brands are valuable. Carol risks those brands' value during remodeling, which would be good for Microsoft and Google, too.

It's no secret that Yahoo has got troubles, which the global economic earthquake will exacerbate. The ground is shaking, which is something Carol should really think about as she remodels Yahoo's house. The easy thing: Cut, cut, cut. Lay off employees, close down or sell some operations, and reduce spending on marketing and partnerships. Such tactics risk Yahoo brands, I say. The brands' value cannot be rightly calculated. Yahoo must retain brand affinity to survive its own problems and those caused by collapsing economies.

Now is the time to invest, not cut back. Carol does deserve a little kudos for one rightly made investment. She writes:

I'm creating a new Customer Advocacy group. After getting a lot of angry calls at my office from frustrated customers, I realized we could do a better job of listening to and supporting you. Our Customer Care team does an incredible job with the amazing number of people who come to them, but they need better resources. So we're investing in that. After all, you deserve the very best.

I like the sound of that remodeling, Carol. If you could apply such sense to every room maybe there is hope. Earlier today, over at Apple Watch, I identified four attributes of companies that are best positioned to survive the economic earthquake:

  • lots of cash on hand;
  • longer product release cycles;
  • aggressive and consistent advertising; and
  • great customer service.

I left out one: strong branding. All five attributes apply to Apple, but only four need apply to Yahoo. The release cycles attribute is for companies that produce physical products, for which there are manufacturing and distribution expenses. Yahoo should adopt shorter release cycles, since its investment is R&D and the products don't go stale on store shelves.

Carol is doing right by making customer service a bigger priority. What she doesn't have is the cash on hand, unlike Apple and Microsoft, which have nearly $30 billion and about $20 billion, respectively. Is Blake the fall guy for Yahoo's weak cash position and hobbled earnings? If so, he's not alone. Yahoo can't seem to hold on to executives, whether they're jumping from a sinking ship or being forced to walk the plank. Other major executives out this week: Marco Boerries (mobile) and Neeraj Khemlani (news and information). Jill Nash (communications) beat them to the exit door by a few weeks.

The departing executives didn't hang around for today's major reorganization. Carol writes:

I'm rolling out a new management structure that I believe will make Yahoo! a lot faster on its feet. For us working at Yahoo!, it means everything gets simpler. We'll be able to make speedier decisions, the notorious silos are gone, and we have a renewed focus on the customer.

She offered more details in an internal memo sent to Yahoo employees:

Tech and Product groups will be combined to create a single organization called Products ... This organization is responsible for the vision, strategy, and quality of every product we create—regardless of region, device format or category ... There are now two regions—North America and International. The regions are responsible for delivering Yahoo!'s products, programming and services to consumers, partners and advertisers in local markets ... Mobile will continue to be a key priority for Yahoo ... All of our product teams will be responsible for incorporating mobile innovations into their products. A Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) role has been created to oversee our global marketing strategy and provide direction for our marketing function.

I'm all for streamlining and for cutting bureaucracy, but Yahoo is losing too many experienced executives in process. Maybe Carol sees them as baggage, part of the languishing legacy left by former Yahoo CEOs Terry Semel and Jerry Yang. Those executives should be credited with building up Yahoo's brands. Be careful, Carol. If you knock down a supporting wall during remodeling, the house will collapse. Maybe those departing executives see in Carol more problems than solutions.

It's too early to say whether or not Carol can succeed. She's only had the job for six weeks. But I will watch and wonder whether her experience running Autodesk is appropriate for Yahoo. Customer service and sales and marketing are about the only major attributes the companies share in common. If the board's goal is remodeling, she'll do just nicely. But the house may be unrecognizable when Carol finishes the job. Autodesk and Yahoo are two very different kinds of businesses.

Why is this a topic for Microsoft Watch? Yahoo's future fate has huge implications for Microsoft, whether Carol's remodeling produces a mighty house or one that collapses into rubble.

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/16549

Comments (10)

zato :

"Why is this a topic for Microsoft Watch?"

It shouldn't be.

kitkat :

@ Zato
Joe is angling at the opinion that Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz is a Microsoft plant and Yahoo is about to either get killed by the new CEO at Microsofts request or get broken up by the new CEO again at Microsofts request.

You see Joe is of the opinion that everything Microsoft wants is what Microsoft gets. ie its Yahoo deal gone bad really is a deal in favour of the borg because there must be an angle we havent seen yet lOl.

Joe needs something to blog about. LOL.

And in further news, Microsoft is about to meet its maker in a new war against open source with its new legal wrangle with Tom Tom and its use of linux and fat32.

Paul :

So far she seems to have a very clear view of what Yahoo's unique value is. Whether she can turn rhetoric into results will be seen over time. As far as her credentials go, a lot of people said that about Lou Gerstner when he took over IBM. He managed to disprove his critics. Maybe she will too. She certainly can't be worse than Yang. One thing that does concern me is that she hasn't been more proactive in doing something with MS and has actually made comments that would seem to hurt some sort of deal there. That's myopic for Yahoo and MS.

AndresFreeLaptopSpeaking :

It's fine if MS wants to acquire Yahoo, but they need to do it on the cheap

zato :

@ kitkat:
"Carol Bartz is a Microsoft plant"...
I hadn't thought of that, but Yahoo would have to be complicit.

“If people had understood how patents would be granted when most of today’s ideas were invented, and had taken out patents, the industry would be at a complete standstill today.”

–Bill Gates (when Microsoft was smaller)

But now, Microsoft is vastly larger but facing a crisis of potential extinction. And what does a large lumbering has-been do when faced with new ideas from others while they continue to wallow in their own increasing ineffectiveness? Why, they change their minds, making themselves to be nothing more than a gaggle of lying bullies whose once-strong empire is rotting from within:

www.techflash.com/microsoft/Microsoft_sues_TomTom_over_patents_in_case_with_Linux_subplot_40305732.html

“Microsoft filed suit against TomTom today, alleging that the in-car navigation company's devices violate eight of its patents -- including three that relate to TomTom's implementation of the Linux kernel.”

And yet they have no problem stealing the "I.P." from others? Greedy thieves always protect what is theirs at the same time that they feel that is their diving right to steal what is yours:

www.eweek.com/c/a/Windows/Open-Source-Code-Finds-Way-into-Microsoft-Product/

“"MPI is key middleware that was designed by a consortia of all the supercomputing vendors in the 1990s to allow the easy portability of code. It abstracts away things like low-latency interconnect, and our focus is making it super easy for ISVs to move their code," Kyril Faenov, Microsoft's director for High Performance Computing, told eWEEK in a recent interview at Microsofts campus in Redmond, Wash.

"Actually, we are probably the first team at Microsoft that will actually ship an open-source component inside of our solution, but we haven't made a lot of noise around this yet," he said.”

Imagine, Microsoft has to use viral, substandard code put together by hippie hackers because a multi-hundred-billion-dollar professional software development company doesn't have the brains or desire to do it themselves.

Innovation? Hahahahhahahaahahahaahaha!

Very good

Chips B Malroy :

Is the US heading for a depression?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7860965.stm

"Business investment was down 19.1%, led by a 27.8% drop in purchases of equipment and software."
----------------------------------------------------
I doubt that MS is so interested in Yahoo these days, with a bad quarter, and now the prospects of a much worse quarter that is coming.

@Philosopher :

the Fat32 patent attack by the M$ patent troll on Tom Tom, is a very thinly disguised attack on Linux. When you think about all the flash drives that comes as Fat32. For M$ itself, Fat32 is no longer being used, or supported, as they moved long ago to NTFS, in fact M$ attitude towards Fat32, could be described as making it abandoware. Fat32 has become a "standard" or sorts. A proprietary standard, which allows a monopoly patent troll, to try to use it to kill off its only competition. As such, antitrust investigators should look into this type of monopoly behavior, and force those how allow monopoly standards to become "the Standards," to become public domain, and have them lose all rights, and monetary compensation for them.

Goblin :

Hi Chips!
-
Quote "Is the US heading for a depression?"
-
Im not sure, but I think Microsoft may be:
-
http://boycottnovell.com/2009/03/01/tomtom-case-summary/

@Goblin:
Nice link again from Roy's site. I think the key problem for M$, is if Tom Tom decides to fight the Fat 32 patent. Fat 32 file system is basically a piece of abandonware for M$, that it is trying to use to kill interoperability with other operating systems. It is a defacto (propitiatory) standard now, that many systems used for interoperability. As I stated above, even the flash drive makers use Fat 32. The EU needs to put a stop to this type of behavior from the monopolist, and declare Fat32 as public domain in the interests of "interoperability." After all, M$ has moved on a long time ago to NTFS.

The playing field must be leveled, to allow free competition to exsist, and the Robber Barons, to not be able to use patents, and or copyrights, to own the air we breath, or Fat32, or multimedia extensions for that matter.

Post a Comment

 
 
RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise