eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
July 18, 2007 2:59 PM

Microsoft's Mixed Motifs



During the Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference 2007, held in Denver last week, CEO Steve Ballmer made big deal out of the company's future new user interfaces. Maybe Microsoft should fix the UIs customers use today.

Microsoft has a big user interface problem. There are simply too many mixed motifs and metaphors, which are inconsistent and confusing even among the same product families.

In his speech last week, Ballmer used term "user interface" 21 different times.

"The shorthand I like to use when we're talking about this evolution in computation and user interface model is software plus services," Ballmer said.

He's got to be freaking kidding. Software plus services is the revolutionary new user interface? Microsoft's existing UIs reveal why Ballmer's vision may be too ambitious.

Office 2007's revamped UI is a wellspring of controversy. Some people praise Microsoft for taking a truly innovative task-oriented approach, while others fault the company for offering no classic mode. The new UI is a one-way street.


Office Ribbon
Office 'Ribbon'

My problem with Office 2007's UI: Fluent is a good concept, but it doesn't mix well with other new Microsoft UI motif approaches. While Microsoft executives incessantly harp on the benefits of integration, they can't seem to deliver a consistent look and feel across so-called integrated products. If anything, the company's motif approaches are contradictory.

For starters, Microsoft only brings the new Office 2007 UI to four applications: Access, Excel, PowerPoint and Word. Outlook, perhaps the most used Office application, gets a modest makeover while InfoPath and OneNote pretty much stick to the old file menu approach.

Office 2007's Fluent does away with the old-style file menu structure, replacing it with task-based visual cues. For consistency's sake and for the benefit of user productivity, Microsoft should have brought the new motif to all Office products.

Moreover, Microsoft should have brought Outlook's search motif to other Office applications. The biggest improvement to Outlook's UI is a fast and accurate search.

Microsoft expects business workers to spend more time in SharePoint—perhaps as much time as they do in Outlook—but the software introduces yet another motif, albeit one that is file menu based.

Like Office 2007, Windows Vista does away with the traditional file menu structure for one that is more task-centric. The problem is that this approach is quite unlike Office 2007.

When Microsoft last simultaneously released Office and Windows, in 1995, they shared a fairly similar file menu motif. Simultaneous releases of Office 2007 and Windows Vista should have been Microsoft's opportunity to leverage one product off the other. But the basic look and feel of the individual products makes them seem more like estranged friends than like siblings.


Vista Menu
Vista Folder Menu

Office Live, Popfly, Silverlight, Visual Studio, Windows Live and Windows Mobile are all examples of Microsoft products that use somewhat different (or even hugely different) UIs. The number of different Microsoft motifs has multiplied with the 2007 product release cycle.

From one perspective, mixed motifs are a way of life. The UI for a television differs from that of the front door or the alarm clock. However, UIs tend to be consistent and familiar across product categories. For example, there may be hundreds of calendars for sale at the local bookstore come the new year, but each one follows a basic monthly motif.

By taking a more task-oriented approach with some of its newer UIs, Microsoft is on the right track. A more common, pervasive, unifying approach is necessary, however, if businesses or consumers are going to "grok" the benefits of what Microsoft refers to as "better together." Office 2007 isn't that much better with Windows Vista. But it should be. The one barrier is the mixed motif approach.

Related Posts:


TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/11340

Comments (5)

joy :

What else would you expect from a committee of geeks? Management spends its days looking at Powerpoint slides. Their lack of interest in the arts and any sense of taste or aesthetics is legend.

Grunge crossed with geek is what users will get. MCSEs are paid to like it, and everyone else just suffers along.

T.B Light :

How will Microsoft partners feel about being induced to infringe?

? Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. Files Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Microsoft Corporation
PR Newswire (Fri, Apr 20)

http://www.niroscavone.com/

Don't think for one moment that VCSY's CEO Rich Wade wasn't sending Microsoft a "SIGN" by hiring one of the best Lawfirms in the country on 06-06-06!

TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 2006

Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. Retains Law Firm in connection with Licensing of United States Patent No. 6,826,744

Fort Worth, TX, June 06, 2006 ? Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. (VCSY) announced today that it has retained the law firm of Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro on a contingency basis to act in connection with the licensing of United States Patent (U.S) No. 6,826,744, the underlying Patent under VCSY?s SiteFlash? and SiteFlash-derived products.

U.S. Patent No 6,826,744 is a system and method for generating computer applications in an arbitrary object framework. The method separates content, form, and function of the computer application so that each may be accessed or modified separately. The method includes creating arbitrary objects, managing the arbitrary objects throughout their life cycle in an object library, and deploying the arbitrary objects in a design framework for use in complex computer applications.

This release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. With the exception of historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this press release involve risk and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement.

Andreas Muther :

Why don't all Ziff Davis magazines and sites look the same? Duh. Demographics and use case and even when they were built.

Simply waving a wand at millions of lines of code is playing Fantasy Coder. Remind me your tech background or what technology company you've worked at that ships products?

bill'sbuttboy :

"Simply waving a wand at millions of lines of code is playing Fantasy Coder."

Hey, that describes the first two years of program management for the Longhorn project!

Marlon Smith :

You can't expect for them to change evrything in one swoop. Give it some time, not sure if I want the Ribbon in Visual Studio. You have a valid point with Outlook, but if the ribbon were everywhere (Windows, Visual Studio, Expression Studio, Live, etc.) we would complain that everything looked the same.

Post a Comment

 
 
RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise