eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
January 23, 2008 8:43 PM

Dell, Microsoft See (PRODUCT) RED



News Analysis. Charity is big business, and there is a giving lifestyle that some consumers and businesses want to be be part of. Tomorrow, Dell and Microsoft officially join the club.

Both companies have become (PRODUCT) RED corporate sponsors. Tomorrow, Dell will start direct-selling two XPS M notebooks, the XPS One PC and 948 printer with the distinct (RED) appearance and logo. From the weekend, the products will be available in Best Buy stores.

The computers will come with Windows Vista Ultimate (RED) Edition, which includes a special (RED) desktop theme, six wallpapers, DreamScene background, screensaver and two sidebar gadgets.

During the Super Bowl, Dell and Microsoft will run a commercial for the new (RED) products.

The (RED) Business Model
(PRODUCT) RED, or (RED), is the brainchild of U2 lead singer Bono and DATA (Debt, AIDS, Trade, Africa) Chairman Bobby Shriver, who want to raise AIDS awareness and funds to fight a disease devastating huge portions of Africa's population. (PRODUCT) RED launched in the United Kingdom in March 2006 and worldwide that October.

Dell and Microsoft join American Express, Apple, Converse, Emporio Armani, Gap, Hallmark and Motorola as corporate partners, which sell special (RED) products and donate profits to The Global Fund to fight AIDs, tuberculosis and malaria.

I've closely watched (RED) since its launch, because of personal interest in the intersection between business and charity.

But "(RED) is not a charity," said Susan Smith-Ellis, chief executive of (RED). "It's a business model. Before there was a (RED), private sector contribution to the Fund was $6 million." This week, contributions reached $54 million, largely because of (PRODUCT) RED.

"Dell and Microsoft give us exposure in 30 countries on five continents," Smith-Ellis said. Dell and, particularly, Microsoft add tremendous reach, visibility and potential contributions to The Global Fund.

Dell and Microsoft will donate $80 from each (RED) PC sold, $50 from either of the two notebooks and five bucks from the printer. Corporate partners set the level of contribution, which, based on my 18 months watching the organization, is significantly more per product from Dell-Microsoft than from the other sponsors.

Windows Vista Ultimate (RED) Edition

During our phone call this afternoon, Smith-Ellis diplomatically handled my question about contribution levels. "The people who buy Converse sneakers, we're bringing them in at a different price point than, say, someone who buys a computer," she said. But she also acknowledged the important "coming together of two big technology titans for this issue."

Dell and Microsoft spokespeople wouldn't discuss the contribution breakdown, as in who gives more. Dell spokeswoman Anne Camden described the donations as a "joint contribution between Dell and Microsoft," but nothing beyond that.

I pressed, because the contributions are significant, and not just compared to other sponsors' products. PC margins are razor thin, so a $50 or $80 contribution is substantial. Sponsors don't charge more for their (RED) products, so Dell and Microsoft won't recover the profits elsewhere.

"They're the same price points," Smith-Ellis said about (RED) and comparable products. "The companies themselves donate their profits."

The (RED) Lifestyle
The donation model hearkens back to Smith-Ellis' assertion that (PRODUCT) RED is a business model rather than a charity. Before I ran this Weblog, I wrote about the organization on my personal Weblog. I concluded then and believe more firmly now that (RED) can succeed if its supporters can sell it as a lifestyle.

The most successful products share strong lifestyle marketing in common. Starbucks isn't about coffee, but a kind of mobile lifestyle. It's the modern version of the watering hole or frontier saloon, where people gather and socialize. Otherwise, why pay two bucks for a plain cup o' joe—or $4-$5 for a fancy coffee, which, by the way, denotes hipness. Apple and Harley-Davidson are among the other companies successfully selling their products as lifestyle choices. Charity—doing good for other human beings—is another kind of lifestyle marketers can appeal to.

The corporations selling (RED) products convey that they are part of the solution rather than the problem. People buying (RED) products can see themselves as solving a worldwide problem. Personally, I've got qualms with consumerism as a means making for donations to The Global Fund. But the approach has merit, nevertheless. Corporate branding is everywhere—on clothes and lots of other products. (PRODUCT) RED stands out as a brand associated with a lifestyle of giving—and the distinctive look of the products draws attention to the caring brand.

People must buy into the lifestyle to get products with the distinctive (RED) appearance and logo. For people that want Windows Vista Ultimate (RED) Edition, the Dell computers are "the only way to get it," said Craig Cincotta, a Windows senior product marketing manager.

So much about what makes (PRODUCT) RED work is about marketing, and it's much more than the logos or specialty products. There, Dell and Microsoft are making some surprising contributions, something both companies need for themselves right now. Dell is looking for a rebound after a tough 2007, and Microsoft needs something to make Windows Vista more appealing. Besides, Microsoft has done little Vista marketing since early 2007.

The companies have jointly worked on a (PRODUCT) RED commercial that will air during next month's Super Bowl. Smith-Ellis praised the companies' "ability to put an ad on the Super Bowl." It's that kind of reach, from which all parties benefit, that makes Dell and, particularly, Microsoft important new (PRODUCT) RED partners.

What's the (RED) Idea?
Dell is a surprising partner for Microsoft here. After all, Dell is the great Vista traitor that aggressively offers Windows XP alongside its successor as an option on new PCs. Now, Dell is unexpected distributor of an exclusive Vista Ultimate edition. But, again, both companies benefit by offering products that fit into the giving lifestyle.

XPS One ((RED)) Something else: Dell's (RED) computers are what NPD categorizes as "premium" SKUs, because the prices are above $1,000. The two XPS M notebooks start at $1,149, with final price determined by configuration. The XPS One desktop is $1,599.

Apple dominates the premium category, with about 60 percent retail market share, according to NPD. More OEMs are looking for premium sales, "but retailers don't want to carry the products," said Chris Swenson, NPD's director of software industry analysis.

(RED) is tough to resist. Surely Best Buy would want in on giving lifestyle marketing, too. One of the sidebar gadgets goes to (RED) informational Web sites, so I asked if Dell or Microsoft planned on using the computers in Best Buy to better promote (PRODUCT) RED. Smith-Ellis jumped and said that she had seen the Best Buy marketing materials. "There will be signage and other materials there that explain the model," she said.

Best Buy gets (RED) benefits without major commitment. Dell gets premium SKUs on store shelves, indicating that it cares and so can its customers. But I don't mean to denigrate Dell. After all, its margins on the hardware will be tighter than Microsoft's on software, so the contribution is meaningful.

Camden said Dell is proud that "part of that purchase is going to help save lives." She also explained that Dell looked at (PRODUCT) RED participation because of a suggestion made on the company's IdeaStorm Web site.

What about Microsoft? I asked if Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates was involved in Microsoft's (RED) participation. Referring to the broader organization, Smith-Ellis said that "he did help get it off the ground." But Gates had nothing to do with with the Dell and Microsoft partnerships. The relationship started through an MSN speaking invitation, from which more Microsoft contacts followed.

"This was strictly done on the Windows side," Cincotta affirmed in response to the Gates question. "We're proud to follow the lead that he's done."

Uh-Oh, (RED) Faced
What surprises me is how long Microsoft took joining (PRODUCT) RED. I can understand Dell taking so long. But Microsoft should want its major brands associated with the giving lifestyle. Apple has been on board for a long time now, with (RED) iPods. I've already stated the potential marketing benefits.

I also wonder why Microsoft has limited (RED) to Windows, when there are several other very sensible tie-ins. The company already sells some (RED)-colored products that could switched over.

Dell is doing some product conversion as it goes (RED). "The XPS notebooks were already (RED) [in color], but they're converting to (PRODUCT) RED," Camden said. "The products are actually being rebranded to the (RED) brand."

Microsoft has (RED) Zune 4, 8 and 80 models of the same color and a different (RED) for Zune 30. Surely there is a giving lifestyle that some Zune users would want to participate in. Microsoft could rebrand, recolor the user interface and engrave a (RED) logo on the back of the product. Surely, a (RED) Zune would sell.

What about Xbox 360? Microsoft already has done several specialty editions. Why not (PRODUCT) RED? Then there is Windows Mobile. Motorola is another (RED) sponsor that just happens to ship Windows Mobile on some cell phones. I think a (RED) Moto phone with customized Windows Mobile theme would be a great fit.

Couldn't Windows Live go (RED), too? Microsoft already has the "i'm" project for charitable donations through instant messaging. Why not include (PRODUCT) RED, and let people pay? For five bucks charged to a cellular account, Microsoft could give people a (RED) theme, emoticons, avatar and other goodies. How about Microsoft keeps $2 and gives away three?

Lots of people talk about green computing. But I think Microsoft should be a little more (RED).

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/12550

Comments (14)

I-Man :

This is what happens when you have valid patents.

(43 days till March 7th)

The technical advantages embodied in the VCSY 744 and 521 patents allow a software manufacturer to step beyond proprietary constraints and build on any platform with any content, any format and any code.

Without the advantages of those two patents, any work-around is limited to traditional software construction techniques which limit developers to specific platforms and specific code bodies keeping their content and formats trapped within a limited development and deployment range.

This is the kind of limitation being demonstrated in Microsoft while players like Adobe and IBM demonstrate the ability to empower any player to work with any platform and any code, thus freeing content and format for any use.

The skeptics like to dismiss these patents because they threaten the status quo of the largest software developers in the world. But size does not guarantee survival in a disruptive period.

In fact, survival is not protected by intellectual property law. A company is required to survive based on its own innovation and not the ability to steal such innovation from others.

If a company can not advance, competition will take it down. Microsoft has shown quite clearly its inability to advance and continues to demonstrate an inability to perform in this new technological arena. IBM and Adobe are the models for the future. Microsoft is a model of the past.

Tom Berber :

43 more days until I-Menst/criminal portuno has to find a new delusion and something else to carry on the fantasy that VCSY will survive the year without going bankrupt.

No wonder the price of VCSY stock is still falling. No wonder his pump-and-dump stock scam is such a failure.

Tom Berber :

I highly recommend anyone with VCSY stock sell. Here is the word straight from the company itself:


Most of what's worth reporting about VCSY is contained in its latest 10-Q. You can find it at:
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetc...

This is the report where VCSY talks about its negative cash flow and how its debts are many times its assets. That report also offers choice tidbits like:

>

also

>


In summary, the company has been losing money consistently. It has not paid its payroll taxes. The 10-Q also shows that the company is in default on many loans. Read it carefully. It shows in exceuciating detail why criminal portuno is so desperate.

JohnJ :

"PC margins are razor thin, so a $50 or $80 contribution is substantial."

It certainly is...

I-Man :

Tom Berber has only one vision and that's to distort the readers vision and understanding of my posts.

What? No answers? Come come, now, folks. There must certainly be at least one whiz brain out there that can tell us all precisely how Microsoft can be expected to seamlessy interconnect and interoperate their Live services and their Windows client across the internet without the benefit of the VCSY patent 6826744 and VCSY patent 7076521.

Nobody? What's the matter, people? Don't you have a clue? Or are you simply going to continue laughing, ridiculing and depending on your wishful thinking to make the problem go away?

Tom Berber :

I-Menst does not want to admit to you that he himself does know the facts. He 100% agrees with me. You know why? Because VCSY says so themselves. They admit to being a foundering company riddled with debt and unable to pay employees, let alone debtors. The reason I-Menst is posting what he does is for deceit only. You see, he cannot refute the truth, because VCSY says so themselves.


So I have to tell you that if you have VCSY stock, sell it now. Better now than later, because you if you wait, it will become worthless.


VCSY is strictly only a patent shill, they have nothing else. Just debt they cannot pay. And it is a patent on software, and it is unenforceable.


Here, read it again. Straight from VCSY. I challenge I-Menst to refute this:


VCSY's latest 10-Q. You can find it at:
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetc...

This is the report where VCSY talks about its negative cash flow and how its debts are many times its assets. That report also offers choice tidbits like:

The Company has suffered significant recurring operating losses, used substantial funds in its operations, and needs to raise additional funds to accomplish its objectives. Negative stockholders’ equity at September 30, 2007 was approximately $19 million. Additionally, at September 30, 2007 , the Company had negative working capital of approximately $12.4 million (although it includes deferred revenue of approximately $2.1 million) and has defaulted or is delinquent on several of its debt obligations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

--------------------------------------

"Management of the Company is continuing its efforts to attempt to secure funds through equity and/or debt instruments for its operations, expansion and possible acquisitions, mergers, joint ventures, and/or other business combinations. The Company will require additional funds for its operations and to pay down its liabilities, as well as finance its expansion plans consistent with the Company’s anticipated changes in operations and infrastructure."


In summary, the company has been losing money consistently. It has not paid its payroll taxes. The 10-Q also shows that the company is in default on many loans. Read it carefully. It shows in exceuciating detail why I-Menst is so desperate.


I ask you, who is distorting? Who is deceiving? Based on what VCSY says about it's own operations, you can see it is I-Menst who is the distorter, the misleader, the liar.

I-Man :

Tom Berber says "Sell VCSY stock now"

I do believe he is starting to show you why he is here!

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah- To Funny!

March 7th is near!! tic, tic, tic............

Tom Berber :

So did you notice that I-Menst did not refute what I wrote? I mean what VCSY themselves report.


What truly is funny is that I-Menst is really trying to hurt you financially with hype about a useless patent troll company. And like I said, he knows I am right and he keeps trying to pull the wool over your eyes.

Again, read what VCSY says about themselves, and you will know the truth. Sell VCSY stock now before you lose everything.

I-Man :

Tom, with the March 7th meeting with the mediator in front of the judge, do you really think that anyone will believe now is a good time to sell?

Do you notice in the VCSY Press Releases below that VCSY already beat up on one Nasdaq company(CDC/Ross) and that was by "Direct Verdict" from the judge. We'll see the same fate for Microsoft if they don't settle with VCSY on March 7th.
Not to mention the many partners who will be angry about being INDUCED TO INFRINGE by Microsoft!

http://www.vcsy.com/press/index.php?year=2007

November 07, 2007
VCSY and Now Solutions Strengthen Access of their Products to Federal Government Sector With Marketing Agreements with LGB & Associates.


October 29, 2007
NOW Solutions Awarded Judgment for $3.1 Million Against Ross Systems, Inc.


October 2, 2007
VCSY?s Subsidiary Files a New Patent Application and Will Market the Patent-Pending Fair Labor Standards Act Payroll System to the U.S. Government Sector


April 26, 2007
Vertical Computer Systems Stengthens Its Security Offerings by Strategic Alliance with Netriplex Corporation


April 20, 2007
Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. Files Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Microsoft Corporation


April 18, 2007
Now Solutions Successfully Resolves Its Lawsuit Against Ross Systems.


March 14, 2007
Vertical Computer Systems Strengthens Security Suite Offering By Acquiring Exclusive Rights for StatePointPlus in Government and Healthcare in the United States and Canada.


January 10, 2007
Jefferson Parish Sheriff?s Office Moves Their emPath Suite Over to NOW?s Hosted Model

Tom Berber :

Now is the time to sell VCSY stock. It is now nearly worthless and the company is headed toward non-existence. If you have not read it, please click on this link: http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?capId=661527
That is from Business Week, not I-Menst.


The patents VCSY holds are unenforceable and therefore are of no threat to Microsoft whatsoever. I highly recommend a sell when it comes to VCSY stock.


Again, please take note that I-Menst does not refute the very facts and evidence that VCSY provides itself. All I-Menst has to go on is $3 mil lawsuit from October last year against a Chinese company. It wasn't enough to put VCSY back on track financially. Not by a long shot.


VCSY is still unable to pay its debts and employees.


I highly recommend that if you happen to have VCSY stock, sell it at your earliest opportunity to minimize your losses. Do not let I-Menst give you false hope.

Joe :

OK, guys enough with the VCSY stock stuff. I-Man, I've been cool about the comments, but when all comments to a post are about VCSY and not about the topic, it's time I said something.

I-Man, I suggest that if you really have to go on about VCSY, you're going to have to comment on the post topic, too. You can do separate comments, but I want to see something on the topic of my post. You got it?

Joe

I-Man :

Joe, that's fair, I respect your request. I'm sorry that your readers had to endure the disruption that Tom Berber deliberately created to try and quiet me.

Joe :

I-Man wrote: "Joe, that's fair, I respect your request."

I-Man,

I'm not trying to ban you from commenting, nor would I block either you or Tom from commenting. Some readers might enjoy the banter. I'm just asking that you lighten up a bit. You've got your bandwagon, and I'm all for free speech. Argue about the story topic once in awhile; that's all I ask.

Joe

Joe;

Thanks man, you da' man!!!!

@JohnJ

You're right, it is razor thin and agree...

Post a Comment

 
 
RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise