eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
October 23, 2008 4:57 PM

Microsoft Q1 2009 by the Numbers



News Analysis. Microsoft started off fiscal 2009 with solid quarterly earnings. But the future doesn't look as bright.

[Editor's note: This was a live document from 4:57 p.m. EDT until 7:05 p.m.]

Microsoft significantly lowered guidance for fiscal 2009 in anticipation of a mild to severe recession. The company already is seeing slowing spending among partners and customers.

That said, for the fiscal 2009 first quarter, Microsoft revenue topped $15.06 billion, for a 9 percent year-over-year increase. Operating income was $6 billion and net income $4.37 billion, or 48 cents per share.

arrow.gifGOT A TIP OR RUMOR?

In July, Microsoft forecast first-quarter revenue in the $14.7 billion to $14.9 billion range, with operating income between $5.9 billion to $6 billion, or 47 cents to 48 cents per share.

During a conference call this afternoon, Microsoft Chief Financial Officer Chris Liddell noted that results came in at the "high end of our guidance."

While Microsoft posted strong year-over-year growth in revenue and earnings, it's the future that worries analysts and investors. Gartner and IDC preliminary third calendar quarter PC shipment data shows signs of slowing consumer PC sales. Businesses carried the quarter.

Fiscal first-quarter results show some trouble ahead. Microsoft's Windows client division revenue increased a muted 2 percent year-over-year growth, while operating income declined by 4 percent.

fy0109a.jpg

Microsoft offered forward guidance. For the fiscal 2009 second quarter, Microsoft expects revenue between $17.3 billion and $17.8 billion, operating income between $6.1 billion to $6.4 billion and 51 cents to 53 cents earnings per share.

For fiscal 2009, Microsoft forecasts revenue between $64.9 billion and $66.4 billion, operating income between $24.4 billion and $25.5 billion and earnings per share between $2.00 and $2.10. In July, Microsoft forecast fiscal 2009 revenue between $67.3 billion and $68.1 billion, operating income between $26.3 billion and $26.9 billion and earnings per share between $2.12 and $2.18. Microsoft has significantly reduced guidance ahead of global economic uncertainty.

During today's conference call, Chris said Microsoft saw a "deterioration of spending" toward the end of the quarter. Microsoft's earlier guidance was based on the assumption that the economy would recover during the second half of the fiscal year. This is "unlikely to occur," Chris said.

fy0109b.jpg

At the high end, Microsoft's revised guidance assumes a "mild recession," and the low end a "deeper recession," Chris said. His comments starkly contrast those made by Apple executives on Tuesday. Apple CEO Steve Jobs expressed uncertainty but confidence about the economy. Chris is more certain that a recession is here and that IT spending is declining. Maybe the Apple execs should look to Microsoft for guidance for a change.

Microsoft saw spending declines begin in mid-September and continue through mid-October—meaning they're not done. Chris attributed spending declines in part to customers and partners being unable to obtain credit to purchase products.

Nevertheless, Chris expressed confidence about the fiscal second quarter because of holiday sales. His uncertainty is about the second half, which is hard to gauge given volatile economic conditions. Chris is being decidedly cautious, which is prudent. It's better that Microsoft prepares for hard times and so doesn't get whacked unprepared. Microsoft has its network of partners to think about, too.

Microsoft has another problem that weak economic conditions may exacerbate: Netbooks are emerging as an important new PC category. Microsoft doesn't effectively compete there because of Windows Vista system requirements. The company licenses Windows XP Home for the category.

Microsoft license revenue is lower for netbooks, mainly because of Windows XP Home. As netbook demand increases, Microsoft's OEM revenue goes down. Netbooks accounted for about 5 percent of notebook shipments in the third calendar quarter, according to Gartner. But today, Chris said in mature markets, netbooks added about 8 percent PC shipment growth. Whoa! That's a huge number.

Chris cautioned that it's too early to say how much economic conditions will drive further netbook sales. True. I expect the category would have taken off, anyway. My prediction: Weak economy will accelerate netbook sales.

Segment Results
Unearned revenue continued to grow, as Microsoft bookings picked up 6 percent year over year. Microsoft ended the quarter with $13.5 billion in unearned revenue, $13 billion of it unbilled. Unearned revenue gives Microsoft some cushion against the economic slowdown. On average, about 25 percent of Microsoft's quarterly revenue comes from recognized unearned revenue. Some divisions benefit more than others. For example, 40 percent of Server and Tools revenue for fiscal 2009 will come from revenue carried from the previous year's licensing sales.

Microsoft exited the quarter with about $25 billion in cash. When asked about future acquisitions, Chris said, "We will continue to buy," with small-to-medium businesses being the "sweet spot." Microsoft acquired 24 companies during fiscal 2008, and Chris said that the pace could continue. Capital won't be the problem, but integration. Microsoft already is putting cost-cutting measures in place, and acquisitions usually come with integration costs.

Client. The Windows group's quarterly revenue topped $4.9 billion, but operating income declined 4 percent year over year. Microsoft estimated it grew 10 to 12 percent year over year. OEM license growth was 8 percent. Growth in mature markets was flat year over year, buoyed by the aforementioned growth from netbooks.

Microsoft expects worldwide year-over-year PC growth between 8 and 12 percent for fiscal 2009. A quarter earlier, Microsoft predicted 20 percent growth, so the company clearly sees slower PC sales ahead. Microsoft expects single-digit PC growth in mature markets. Growth in emerging markets should be in the mid-teens. Chris warned that, looking ahead, Client revenue will be subject to the "variability" of PC hardware sales.

Commercial and retail licensing grew 22 percent year over year, or $125 million. But OEM licensing declined 1 percent, or $46 million, even as units increased 8 percent. The change comes from increased sales of lower-cost Windows versions in mature and emerging markets. The OEM channel continues to account for about 80 percent of Windows client revenue.

Server and Tools. Server is Microsoft's dream division because of annuity licensing contracts. Revenue for server software, server applications and developer tools increased 17 percent year over year, or $395 million, mainly because of volume-licensing contracts. Unearned revenue from annuity-licensing contracts increased 28 percent. Related: Microsoft consulting services grew 19 percent year over year.

fy0109c.jpg

Business. The division had a strong quarter, with revenue up 20 percent and operating income up 23 percent year over year. Back-to-school was good to Microsoft. Office 2007 promotions increased consumer revenue by 36 percent, or $288 million. Business revenue grew 16 percent. Office accounts for about 90 percent of the division's revenue.

Online Services. The division hemorrhaged capital yet again, even as Microsoft claims gains. The division lost $480 million on $770 million revenue. Online advertising revenue grew 15 percent year over year to $72 million. Agency revenue from aQuantive topped ad sales at $98 million.

Even as the ad market slows because of global economic concerns, Microsoft expects ad revenue to grow 13 percent in fiscal 2009. Great. How about reaching profitability some time in this century?

Entertainment and Devices. Strong Xbox 360 console shipments drove revenue, as usual, but was offset by the year-ago quarter when Microsoft launched Halo 2. Revenue for the Xbox and PC game platforms declined 22 percent, or $331 million. During the quarter, Microsoft shipped 2.2 million consoles. Microsoft forecast flat revenue for the remainder of fiscal 2009.

I see that, again, as signs of the slowing global economy. But there's something else at work. Future growth is "impacted by recent Xbox 360 pricing cuts," Chris said.

[Editor's note: Several number corrections were made, and all three charts have been updated.]

[Please send your tips or rumors to watchtips at live.com].

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/15494

Comments (14)

Your chart headers look suspicious to me. Don't you compare FY2009Q1 and FY2008Q1 data in the charts?

Flu bug might have gotten you early.

--rj

aQuantitive is relatively new, stop being so harsh. You need to understand that in general the Online Ad business is its infancy. I notice the tone of this post, you are trying your utmost best to eek out the worst. Microsoft will do well in the next quarter and the one after that and the one after that and you Joe will continue make the same dooms day predictions about the Company. Stop comparing a comparing a Company with 25 million users and a platform with 1% vs a Company with 1 billion Windows users and growing.

Why does anyone read this guys garbage :

Here we go again! Please change this to www.Microsoft-watchMeDogThemOut.com.

With all that is going on in the ecomony, it just kills you Joe that Microsoft beat estimates. Which shows that all your other doom and gloom reports on them don't mean a thing. And you are cluessless when it comes to technology reporting.

And guess what there genious, every company has reported downward guidance for the remainder of the year due to the economy you moron.. Even your favorite company APPLE did as well. But gee, I didn't see you comparing that now did you. Because that would go against your religion. Oh yeah, I almost forgot, you don't have religion. You are just a inside reporter for Apple trying to spew the FUD.

Lawrence D'Oliveiro :

Interesting about the netbooks issue. Windows 7 is showing no signs of addressing the resource bloat of Vista, so it's not going to be any more netbook-friendly. That means Microsoft is reduced to continuing to offer its increasingly antiquated, clunky Windows XP to avoid ceding this market to Linux altogether.

Does that sound to you like a company with a solid, long-term strategy to keep on top of the market? It doesn't to me.

Lawrence, return rates for Linux based Netbooks is 4 times higher than Windows. Thats a bad sign its not representing itself well in the market. Next, ASUS CEO said that in the second of 2009, the Eee PC will support Windows 7 with multi-touch capabilities. Stop assuming things you don't even know about.

Lawrence, return rates for Linux based Netbooks is 4 times higher than Windows. Thats a bad sign its not representing itself well in the market. Next, ASUS CEO said that in the second half of 2009, the Eee PC will support Windows 7 with multi-touch capabilities. Stop assuming things you don't even know about.

Asus Said What?????? :

Andre De Costa can you get the facts right?? Asus said in a report that you can read on groklaw that there is a similar return rate on windows and linux netbooks. Andre is not quoting Asus he is quoting a microsoft report put out to try to taint the linux netbook market.

Atom on netbooks has just been trashed by all the technology review sites as worse and slower than the similar Arm chips. Now Intel resorts to trying to trash Arm because their own Atom chip is crap.


Asus Said What????????:

Don't talk nonsense, how can the return rate of Linux based Netbooks be 4 times higher than Windows while the same return rates as Windows based netbooks at the same time? That does not make one iota of sense.

A friend of mine returned his Windows XP Eee PC because he prefers Vista.

chips b malroy :

Really I think Andre did his best on this post and deserves a raise from Mr Ballmer and all his minions at MS home base. Andre really does his best, even I got to give him credit. Well, except for the double post, but even softies are human, well, maybe, not totally sure on that one. That Andre is intelligent is not in question, its just his honestly that is. When you owe your allegiance to your employer, you might say a few things you know are not accurate. One thing, my opposite Andre, and just a suggestion. Try not to use phases like "rich" this and that, its so Micro$oft copy and paste, and not up to your standards. Is it?

Andre Da Costa the MS Shill say :

"Lawrence, return rates for Linux based Netbooks is 4 times higher than Windows. Thats a bad sign its not representing itself well in the market. Next, ASUS CEO said that in the second of 2009, the Eee PC will support Windows 7 with multi-touch capabilities."
--------------------------------------------------
Now Andre, mostly well say anything. But this time, he has actually used some truth, although, distorted truth, or half truth in his position. Four times higher on some netbooks, yes, but only because, if you check the links, and I have, it because the users, returned them thinking they were getting Windows XP, not Linux. They had no problem with Linux actually, except that it was not XP, which they thought it was. They did not want Vi$ta as Andre, the MS Shill has said. And some companies, that clearly market their product, as having Linux installed, do not have this problem. Andre, save yourself the embarrassment and time for me, of looking up the proper links to disprove you. You know you are wrong once again, why give it a rest and look for employers who will let you tell the truth?

While I tire of your lies, and dishonesty, I still have hope for you.


Zukuzu :

The latest generation of netbooks that have displays from 8.9" can easily run Aero on. Only Vista's price doesn't let the vendors install it. Some, like HP, actualy does and have to greatly discount them then.

thatguy :

Joe, why even bother posting this? "The future doesn't look so bright" (???) When have you ever put anything on your blog that states anything different? Seriously, you have no idea what you're doing anymore...

Have a nice time in the economic crisis without a job because you don't know how to report honestly...

thatguy :

Joe, why even bother posting this? "The future doesn't look so bright" (???) When have you ever put anything on your blog that states anything different? Seriously, you have no idea what you're doing anymore...

Have a nice time in the economic crisis without a job because you don't know how to report honestly...

hallucinogen52 :

Halo 2 launched in 2004... I think you might have meant Halo 3 :) But if MS is still making that much money from Halo 2 more power to them!

Goblin :

Im pleased to see the return of Andre!

In regards to the returning of Linux machines, I dont profess to know (or have an inside knowledge of) the actual figures or the reasons behind why the units were returned. However Im just pleased that people have given a Linux system a try. If its been returned because it wasnt what the user wanted, then thats great and that user will get a system that more suited to them.

The fact that Linux is being offered in stores as an alternative at all is a good sign, as is the fact that people are being made aware of choice.

What MS-Agents and affiliates cant understand is that for open source supporters like myself, its the choice that I want users to have. I gain nothing from mass migration to Linux nor to Windows nor to a Mac. If people are choosing the best system for them on the grounds of testing the others then thats all that matters.

We can all make predictions about what the future holds for the PC. I dont think many people would have predicted the growth of the Internet, and in fact the first car phone wasnt predicted by many to be the starting point of the mobile phone and its global usage.

I hope the uptake on pre-installed Linux systems continues to grow, and infact a quick google will reveal that in the UK more and more companies are adopting the platform as an option for customers. Dell is probably is the most well known one, but there are plenty more out there. At our local supermarket they are selling a laptop system, with open source products on it for under £200 (to replace MS counterparts), its a good sign of a more balanced computing future.

Will the Linux pre-installed machines flop? or will they become more popular than Windows ones? - Who cares? Im enjoying my computing experience with Linux, and I have nothing to gain whatever happens.

and as I love to quote Andre "Eee PC will support Windows 7 with multi-touch capabilities" - Didnt we see promises with many PC's pre-vista release that they would be compatible? Isnt that why MS is in a little trouble at the moment?

Get over to distrowatch and try out a Linux flavor yourself! www.distrowatch.com


Post a Comment

 
 
RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise