eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
May 21, 2007 10:55 AM

One Redmond Way | Razorfish



Microsoft's aQuantive acquisition means that the software giant is buying itself an ad agency. After all, that's what Avenue A | Razorfish is best known for. Will Microsoft marketing improve as result?

The answer isn't easy, for several reasons:

  • Microsoft might see conflict of interest with advertising customers, if Avenue A | Razorfish produces ads in house.
  • Ad customers might balk at conflict of interest if Avenue A | Razorfish produces ads in house.
  • Microsoft may have contractual obligations with other ad agencies, such as McCann Erickson.
  • Microsoft corporate culture is fairly insular, which over time could skew the in-house ad agency's ability to effectively market the company.

I don't see a big problem. I assume Microsoft uses MSN adCenter, while still offering services to others. Why should Avenue A | Razorfish be any different?

The bigger challenge is one of perception. Microsoft advertising and branding is a train wreck, although the company has done some track rebuilding with the Vista, Xbox and Zune campaigns. Ad agency McCann Erickson deserves credit for turning around some Microsoft branding. Still, there is no iconic ad, whereas Apple has a string of recent commercial campaign successes, including "Switchers" and "Get a Mac." Surely, Microsoft could do better. But there's hope, such as the new Windows Live Hotmail commercials.

Microsoft's advertising problem is complex:

  • Brand names are too long. That said, Expression, Silverlight, Windows Vista and Zune are all moves in the right direction, and there are cool logos for each product, too. Long product names are tougher to market, so Microsoft needs more of this shorter nomenclature. There are reasons why book titles tend to be five words or less: They're catchy, easier to remember and deliver more impact (I concede the Harry Potter series gets away with six-and-seven word titles).
  • Feature integration makes benefits more complex to communicate. Microsoft packs so much stuff into Windows and other products—and there is cross-product integration—it's tougher to communicate in a simple and straightforward way what are the benefits. A good agency as part of the company producing technology could better ferret out those benefits and better sell them.

    Example commercial: Scene opens with Jack meeting his new wife's parents for the first time. There is some nervous fidgeting around the coffee table where Jack will show the couple's wedding video from the Las Vegas elopement. The camera cuts to the computer, where there is no video—it's not on the computer, after all—and the camera cuts back to Jack and his sweating brow. But no sweat, as Jack remotes in to his Windows Home Server, pulls up the video in a two-second search and starts streaming content to the laptop.

  • Microsoft's brand just isn't cool. It may never be. There is too much baggage because of the company's size, its antitrust problems, past business practices and stodgy marketing. C`mon, Microsoft doesn't have a corporate logo, other than its name. How do you memorably sell that? But Microsoft is big enough that there is room enough for brands, like Xbox. Silverlight and Windows Live that are potential break-out brands, and there is still hope for Zune. Microsoft's Zune branding efforts are quite good, although the marketing has got to improve a whole lot more to take on iPod. But the basic Zune foundation looks solid.

Microsoft executives and product managers love to talk about eating their own dog food, meaning using their own products. Avenue A | Razorfish could really distinguish itself by successfully making over Microsoft's brand and image—and that would be huge testimony to quality of the ad agency's services. The ad agency's best advertising of itself could be Microsoft marketing.

But if Microsoft fails its makeover, the example might just flush Avenue A | Razorfish's credibility right down the toilet.

Related Posts:

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/11012

Comments (4)

Elaine :

Microsoft's main customers are OEMs and large corporations The only "marketing" involved with those sales transactions is "Sign here, this is what your license costs per box". Steve Ballmer does not understand merchandising, advertising, or any of the other details needed to successfully sell products to the general public. Billy G. doesn't care, and he and Ballmer tend to hire managers who mimic them, so you now have a giant corporation with absolutely no rhythm or marketing common sense. Or as Steve Jobs once said about Microsoft, "They have no taste".

IMO that is why their branding and retail efforts have been such total flops. Can they buy some rhythm or even a clue? Time will tell, but I'm not putting good odds on their chances.

Jake :

Microsoft's main customers are OEMs and businesses. Small and Medium business makes up a large customer base for Microsoft. This is why they offer volume discounts at 5 licenses. As far as advertising, Microsoft Advertises for what it is.

Microsoft focuses their advertising on what they have to offer and what they can do. Apple makes entertaining advertisements by comparing themselves to Microsoft. Microsoft doesn't have to. Microsoft compares to itself. Similar to a comedian bashing a politician, it is entertaining, but I’m not going to vote for the comedian to do a politician’s job.

Beyond that what operating system is on most home computers? As far as I know it is Windows and not Mac OS, so it would seem the overall marketing strategy is quite effective.

Always remember that advertising is really only a small part of marketing.

Albert :

Jake has it all right. Stole the words right out of my mouth.

TomT :

Apple's Mac commercials are such a huge success, that their USA market share has skyrocketed all the way up to 5%. -grin

Post a Comment

 
 
RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise