Primax: Of Mice and Mysteries
|
News Analysis It's not |
Yesterday, Microsoft filed with the International Trade Commission a patent infringement complaint against Primax Electronics of Taiwan. This company does exist, right?
Microsoft claims 20 other companies have licensed mouse patents for Magnifier, Tilt Wheel and U2 technologies, but not Primax.
"Microsoft has filed an action today with the ITC after making repeated attempts during the past several years to engage in meaningful licensing discussions with Primax," Horacio Gutierrez, Microsoft's deputy general counsel for Intellectual Property and Licensing, said in a statement.
"Microsoft has an open intellectual property licensing policy, but in situations such as this, in which a reasonable licensing agreement cannot be reached despite our best efforts, we have no choice but to pursue legal action to protect our innovations," Horacio emphasized.
I count seven disputed patents in the 27-page complaint, which is dated July 28 but not disclosed by Microsoft until late yesterday.
"Primax's practice of using our innovations without taking a patent license is unfair to the many companies that have already licensed our technology, so we are taking action to protect both our partners and our innovations," Horacio asserted.
Right, but does Primax even exist? The company has a Web site that apparently hasn't been updated since the Consumer Electronics Show in January and quite possibly not before. Primax issued its last press release in December 2007.
Primax has a stock ticker, but it's no longer listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. So, I have to wonder: Has Microsoft sued a phantom?
Primax was founded in 1984, and I can find business information from third parties through 2006, the same year as the copyright on the Web site. The main address is the same as listed in Microsoft's complaint, so I'm confident of not confusing one Primax for another.
The Primax Web site lists four subsidiaries in three countries, one being the United States. I called the branch office in California, Polaris Electronics, and got a working number. But nobody on the phone, since it was after hours. Well, damn. Bloomberg reporter Susan Decker started calling before I did, and she actually got somebody on the phone who said requests for comments would be forwarded to Taiwan.
Update: Early Thursday afternoon, I spoke with unnamed person at Primaxmeaning he answered the phone. He described the Polaris operation as a "sales office." When I asked if Polaris was affiliated with Primax, he said, "Yes." But he didn't know about any Microsoft lawsuit. "Maybe my boss knows. But he's not here yet."
This office is not the same as Polaris Electronics of Olathe, Kan., which makes hermetic welders.
Google Finance lists Primax as "inactive," with the last financial information from June 2007. More Google searching led to a dead link for a Goliath profile on Primax. The manufacturer is no longer listed in Goliath's business information database.
I'll admit that I'm no expert on reading patent complaints, but I wonder if even Microsoft is uncertain who is the infringer. From Page 3: "On information and belief, Primax, or others on its behalf, manufactures the accused products in China and then imports them into the United States, and/or sells them after importation into the United States."
The legal filing had a bunch of exhibits, No. 11 being a Hoover's report. I searched Hoover's for Primax Electronics and got two matches: Dongguan Primax Electronics in China and the aforementioned Polaris Electronics in Pleasanton, Calif. Both companies are listed as subsidiaries on the Primax Web site.
According to Hoover's the Guangdong, China, operation had $182 million in sales last year and employs 3,000 people. The Pleasanton, Calif., location employs 15 people and had $3.1 million in sales last year. I'm not a Hoover's subscriber, otherwise I would have even more information to share.
Clearly, Microsoft has filed an infringement complaint against somebody. The real question: Is that somebody going to be in Taiwan or somewhere else? For whatever it's worth, I searched for Primax products early this morning. I found a few HDTVs listed here and there but none in stock. I came up with nothing for mice and scanners, the latter for which Primax is better known.
There are reasons why Microsoft filed its complaint with the ITC. Uncertainty about who, what or where is Primax is perhaps reason enough.
If you live in Taiwan and can confirm Primax exists, please educate everybody in the comments.
[Please send your tips or rumors to watchtips at gmail.com].

Comments (4)
What exactly is the purpose of this web-site (besides the obvious of getting ad hits)?
Really?
You did a few minutes of google search and couldnt get all the information you wanted. And now you want to insinuate that Microsoft doesnt even know who they are suing? I mean, really, are you for real? Are you the same guy who complained about the Mojave Experiment being "arrogant"? Can you see the irony here? In other words, "Say Joe, can you say irony"? Microsoft has been having license discussions for a few months and they dont know who they are suing because your few minutes of "research" didnt get you anything? Brilliant and humble analysis!
Considering the amount of verbiage around your "research" modus operandi, it almost seems like you are trying to impress the audience on your ability to do some search.
Be consistent - more importantly, be REAL. And please leave the rhymes and poetry out of "analysis" targetted at a technical/professional audience. Even your iPhone-pizza-teens will roll their eyes in disbelief.
Posted by Joe | July 31, 2008 11:57 AM
Joe,
Please disregard the above comment. You are a valued and keen industry insider and we appreciate your reporting.
Scouts out!
Posted by TK | July 31, 2008 12:15 PM
"Yesterday, Microsoft filed with the International Trade Commission a patent infringement complaint against Primax Electronics of Taiwan. This company does exist, right?"
Joe, I thought it was very odd that you didn't check and confirm on your own if this company does "exist."
Simple research would show if it did or didn't. Isn't that a part of journalism?
I don't mean to pick on you at all, and that isn't my purpose in life, far from it. I come here to find out things that are going on deep within the industry pertaining and specifically to Microsoft.
In general, I like your commentary, perhaps your insight might be better suited after you get your facts and base your opinion upon the "research" afterwards -- Besides you are certainly entitled to your opinion and thoughts upon the subject in your own style.
Let's face it, you cannot please everyone all the time. You're still going to get someone who will not agree with your reporting, so what?
I know that there is a lot of opinionated people here that regularly comment about how much they dislike or "hate" Microsoft that may cloud the journalistic clarity of obtaining facts and that may sway your personal views, again, sir, I am not trying to be negative, but constructive.
I certainly enjoy your style, wit, and humor and that's why I'll keep dropping in now and then to read what is going on in Joe's world.
Yes, be and keep it real by all means, but also be yourself too.
TK wrote: "You are a valued and keen industry insider and we appreciate your reporting."
I also concur...
Posted by TotaltarianMicrosoftX64 | July 31, 2008 1:22 PM
Vertical Computer Systems Inc. (VCSY) settled the patent infringement claim that it initiated in federal court against Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), according to a document filed Friday with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under a confidential settlement agreement, the company said it granted Microsoft a non-exclusive, fully paid-up license under the patent which was the subject of the legal proceeding. No further details of the settlement was provided in the filing.
Posted by Jeff Walters | August 3, 2008 1:06 AM