What Happens if Microsoft Warns?
|
News Analysis. Microsoft issued a dire profit warning at the start of the last recession, in December 2000. Will the 2008 recession lead to another warning? |
UBS analyst Heather Bellini has raised the red flag, so to speak, over Microsoft's 2009 fiscal second quarter, according to a Friday report from Bloomberg. Could Microsoft really miss its forecast, as she warns? I'm not yet convinced, although the economic climate is even stormier than when Microsoft gave second quarter guidance in late October. It's too close to call, for now.
For fiscal 2009 second quarter, Microsoft had predicted revenue between $17.3 billion and $17.8 billion, operating income between $6.1 billion to $6.4 billion and 51 cents to 53 cents earnings per share. Heather doesn't buy it. She expects $16.7 billion revenue and 48 cents earnings per share.
For fiscal 2009, Microsoft forecasted revenue between $64.9 billion and $66.4 billion, operating income between $24.4 billion and $25.5 billion and earnings per share between $2.00 and $2.10. In July, Microsoft forecast fiscal 2009 revenue between $67.3 billion and $68.1 billion, operating income between $26.3 billion and $26.9 billion and earnings per share between $2.12 and $2.18. Microsoft reduced guidance ahead because of global economic uncertainty.
For anyone trying to call Microsoft earnings, I've put together mitigating factors that are sure to affect fiscal second quarter, which ends on Dec. 31.
Annuity contracts. The 2000 recession was devastating to high-tech companies:
- The dot-com stock bubble had collapsed.
- Enterprises had just come off a big PC replacement cycle for the so-called Year 2000 crisis; many weren't buying.
- ISP discounts lead to a huge surge in consumer PC sales earlier in the year that later led to sales collapse when recession hit.
- Just about every high-tech company struggled to meet sales goals.
Microsoft applied lessons learned from the 2000 recession to software sales. In 2001, Microsoft positioned future revenue for predictability. In May, the company announced changes that would later eliminate off-the-shelf upgrades and commit many business customers to two- or three-year annuity contracts for future discounts. Today, about 40 percent of Microsoft revenue comes from volume licensing sales. For those sales with annuity contracts, Microsoft has cash in the bank. The company accounts for annuity contracts as unearned revenue, which is realized on an ongoing basis.
Microsoft ended its fiscal first quarter with $13.5 billion in unearned revenue, $13 billion of it unbilled. Microsoft typically realizes about 25 percent of each quarter's revenue from its unearned stash. Microsoft has cushion in 2008 it didn't in 2000. A Microsoft profit warning would be a chilling oracle of doom for companies that sell or service PC hardware and software. If Microsoft warns, the larger sales situation for other software developers and the company's partners will be worse than dire.
PC sales. Windows isn't the cash generator that it once was. Microsoft's client division is still hugely important, but Business and Server and Tools divisions are conjoined and together pull in an increasing share of revenue and profits. Their combined fiscal first quarter revenue was $9.15 billion, or about 61 percent of Microsoft total revenue. These two divisions also sell the most software through volume licensing and supporting "Software Assurance" annuity contracts. Many businesses can upgrade to Office 2007 without purchasing new hardware; same can be said of much Microsoft server software.
But the office-server combination can only take Microsoft so far. Even with a 4 percent year-over-year decline in fiscal second quarter, the Client division generated the most income ($3.67 billion) of any Microsoft business group. The question everybody is asking: What about calendar fourth quarter? Some people will say that earnings warnings from Dell and Intel forebode trouble. But I'm not convinced their problems are going to be Microsoft's. My reasoning:
- Microsoft is more like HP than Dell or Intel. HP performed well during third calendar quarter and, so far, has stuck to fourth-quarter guidance. HP and Microsoft have huge global reach and sell to and service customers through well-established and far reaching partner channels. Dell sells direct with some retail, and is largely contained to the United States. Intel sells ODMs and OEMs, which are highly likely to cut back orders early to avoid building up too much channel inventory. In a recession, too few is better than too many.
- In October, Microsoft CFO Chris Liddell said that sales took a dramatic downturn around Sept. 15. More than 80 percent of Client revenue comes from license sales to OEMs. Presumably, most OEMs already had placed their holiday orders by mid-September. I see more risk to Microsoft's fiscal third quarter than its second. OEMs surely have curtailed future ordersIntel's warning is evidence enoughbut nominally for second quarter.
- Worldwide PC forecasts from Microsoft and industry analysts remain in the high single digits to low double digits, despite global economic turmoil. Year over year, United States will likely be flat, perhaps at best, but growth was still strong in emerging markets as recently as late October. Even with the tough economic climate, in October Microsoft predicted worldwide PC growth of 8 percent to 12 percent during fiscal 2009, which ends June 30.
I'm not expecting great results from the Client group, but not dismal either.
IT spending. It's down but not out. In mid-November, IDC revised its 2009 forecast for IT spending, after the bottom fell out of financial markets. IDC predicted worldwide spending to increase 2.9 percent year over year; previously, IDC forecast 5.2 percent. For the United States, 0.9 percent growth, down from an earlier forecast of 4.2 percent.
Fourth quarter is the more immediate concern, and I'm not hopeful about the United States where 533,000 jobs were lost last monththe largest number since December 1974. Factors affecting spending on Microsoft software:
- Companies laying off or closing down won't be buying new software licenses. If anything, they'll be looking to redistribute existing licenses rather than acquire new ones.
- It has been said that no one gets fired for buying Microsoft. Not so, during economic crisis when the person making the purchasing decision might be laid off next week. The "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" axiom will be the operating mandate for many IT organizations.
- The economic atomic bomb set off in the United States during the last weeks of September didn't spread fallout to global markets until early fourth quarter. Microsoft bookings may have continued well into the quarter, particularly in emerging markets.
IT spending is tracking downward for second half of Microsoft's fiscal year. If new billings are down now, what matters: When and how much the buying stopped during fourth quarter.
Credit crunch. While not widely publicized, credit problems have worsened in the last couple weeks. The spreading fallout is poised to do far more damage late-quarter than anything seen earlier. The worst credit problems had largely been contained to financial institutions, which wouldn't lend to each other and so not as much to businesses and particularly consumers. The new problem isn't borrowing but debt. Beleaguered banks are finally passing their pain onto consumers and small businesses. The pain is coming now, in November credit card statements.
Minimum payments are ballooning as some banks increase interest rates and others raise the percentage of minimum payments. A friend of mine saw his interest rate from a large and reputable national bank jump to nearly 32 percent. For many consumers and small businesses, the bad news hit their mailboxes just as the Christmas shopping season kicked off.
Most people don't give Office for Christmas, but home-based or small businesses will buy anytime. I expect these segments to curtail spending as ballooning credit payments sap profits. Consumers planning PC purchases might buy something cheaper, like a new smartphone or music player. Microsoft should see nominal impact from lower PC sales in the current quarter; more in next quarter, if too much inventory sits unsold after the holidays some OEMs would acquire fewer licenses.
Something else: Hard times mean more people will steal. Casual piracy rates are sure to eke up, as consumers and small businesses make do with less. Microsoft product activation can prevent multiple PC installations of software, but not piracy across channels, such as OEM Windows versions purchased in the aftermarket or small businesses buying Office Home and Student (Yes, even without Outlook). In these hard times, every product stolen is a lost desperately needed sale.
Conservative guidance. Chris Liddell offered muted guidance nearly a month after U.S. stocks started a period of protracted collapse and consumers and businesses pulled back spending. Microsoft tends to be more conservative than ambitious in its financial guidance. I believe that Chris left room in the model for worsening conditions. Microsoft's divisional growth guidance for fiscal second quarter:
- Client, 7-10 percent
- Server and Tools, 16-17 percent
- Business, 7-8 percent
- Online Services, 6-10 percent
- Entertainment and Devices, -5 to 1 percent
That said, conditions have worsened rather than gotten better since Microsoft offered guidance on Oct. 23. Widespread layoffs and the potential for them is causing fear among many businesses. Some IT managers would rather risk getting fired for doing nothing than spending on new technologies that looks like greater risk to the job.
Microsoft has yet to announce layoffs, which raises the question, "why?" One answer: There is no need to cut heads, to make the quarter. Another: Microsoft doesn't want to lay off among its more than 90,000 employees. Layoffs are the tried-and-true approach for cutting expenses to meet quarterly goals. If there's a Microsoft canary in the mine, layoffs will be it. That's assuming Microsoft puts shareholders before employees.
Is Heather Bellini right? You tell me? Has your company stopped or curtailed buying new Microsoft licenses since Sept. 30? Please respond in comments or by e-mail.
[Please send your tips or rumors to watchtips at live.com].


Comments (16)
Whether they warn in advance or not, they are going to miss this quarter. And then they will have to warn for the full year, because they're not going to make that either.
"That's assuming Microsoft puts shareholders before employees."
They haven't so far and under Ballmer never will. Speaking of layoffs, it's ironic that it was Bellini herself who asked Ballmer and Liddell last quarter why their weren't considering more aggressive headcount measures given the likelihood of slower sales for not only several quarters, but potentially several years.
Posted by Paul | December 8, 2008 2:16 AM
I wonder if they'll slow down on sales.
Do not forget Microsoft is in a billiant position saleswise. And the reason is: the made a cockup of Vista. Programmingwise, marketingwise etc.
Now most corporations are still on XP. Lots of home users are too. Just imagine the following, support on XP will end in 2010, 7 will be a lot better than Vista.
That will mean the other 90% of the businesses (the ones that have not transitioned to Vista) will go to 7. If sales are down for Microsoft that will mean no prolongation of XP support.
Posted by Charlie | December 8, 2008 3:24 AM
Also nice skips around that MS market share in desktop OS's is under 90% just. Last time that was so was 1994. Its not just the lack of money. Its 100 percent screwup.
Posted by oiaohm | December 8, 2008 6:34 AM
I think they will announce reduced revenue and profit. The economic slowdown is a nice excuse, but I think their problems are far deeper than a small recession.
http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200812051742DOWJONESDJONLINE000966_FORTUNE5.htm
Posted by billybob | December 8, 2008 10:03 AM
@billybob
This will be more than a "small recession." Folks, this is going to be a deep recession.
Of course they're going to miss their estimates. It's just a matter of how much and how many employees M$ will have to cut in order to keep costs inline with the next 12-24 months of income.
I'll make no specific predictions beyond simply stating that M$, like 99% of all U.S. companies, will have to let some number of employees go in calendar '09.
Posted by Jay | December 8, 2008 12:39 PM
Another thing companies will do is totally confuse the accounting reporting by doing a major acquisition and/or selling off some divisions. This then makes it very hard to compare to other quarters. If they buy Yahoo, it will be a loser in the long term, but might obfuscate the current quarterly results. Then they hope the recession is ending by the time the dust settles.
Posted by smist08 | December 8, 2008 12:57 PM
Does anyone think Vista, open source mandates, companies exploring open source options like Open Office, Apple doubling/tripling their market share might have just have tiny bit to do with it?
Posted by Ralph | December 8, 2008 5:33 PM
With no one using Vista, this provides a huge problem. With everyone using XP with no plans to switch to Vista and MS dropping support for XP, then why would anyone pay MS for support contracts? Support/upgrade contracts from larger corporations make up a huge percentage of MS revenue now. MS took a big hit when it dropped VB 6 support and all these corporate IS departments stopped paying support. Looks like the same thing is going to happen but on a much larger scale. Ie corporations are paying a lot of money for support/upgrades but they get no value since they don't like what they have to upgrade to, and MS doesn't support the products they actually use.
Posted by smist08 | December 8, 2008 5:50 PM
"With no one using Vista, this provides a huge problem."
Are you really this ignorant?
Posted by mark | December 8, 2008 5:53 PM
Ralph says :
"Does anyone think Vista, open source mandates, companies exploring open source options like Open Office, Apple doubling/tripling their market share might have just have tiny bit to do with it?"........
To the point, and I agree. The reason Mac and Linux are now taking desktop market share from Microsoft is? It can be summed up in a few simple words:
Malware, DRM, WGA, Bloat, Bugs
Apple's Security Paradox
http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/03/apple-security-hackers-tech-security-cx_ag_1203apple.html?feed=rss_news
"Even as Macs have multiplied, the number of viruses and Trojans targeting them has fallen.
As Apple's slice of the computer market grows, cyber security researchers have long warned that hackers would someday turn their attention away from PCs and toward innocent Macbooks and iPhones."..................
What goes for Macs is even better for lack of malware on Linux. Malware is the reason that I see many Windows users abandoning Microsoft, and justly so.
Posted by The Hand | December 8, 2008 8:20 PM
The likelihood of businesses moving to Windows 7 during a financial crisis is minimal. Windows 7 is a revamp of Vista; in benchmarks, it ran exactly the same as Vista... EXACTLY THE SAME!
This means that all those XP machines that they are running on will still need scrapped as they most likely do not support HDCP, do not have the necessary hardware requirements, etc etc. And right now, no company wants to spend that amount of money to upgrade 500+ employees when they are considering layoffs.
At our financial company, we are swapping everyone over to thin clients as we speak, moving to Asterisk for our conferencing and telephony, and Linux and MySQL for servers and internal databases. Management is so happy with this move that they are continuing to check out what other software can be replaced to cut our costs and are now looking at OpenOffice as well.
They will continue to use those XP desktops for a long time to come now that they have moved to serving the applications from a central location.
And here in Washington, governments and schools are considering Linux on the desktop more and more to cut on licensing costs.
So perhaps in 5 years people will be purchasing those Windows 7 machines but in the near future, they are again screwed.
Posted by Xeno | December 9, 2008 4:16 PM
@Xeno,
Completely agree with your comments, and certainly in my workplace we are slowly making the transition.
-
Youre post echo's many businesses that I have spoken to. They have seen the benefits of open source and indeed Linux, but have been frightened off by what a salesperson has told them.
-
2009 will be crunch time for the Windows platform (IMO) and personally I dont believe it will sell even if Windows 7 is the best O/S since AmigaDOS/Workbench 1.3
-
The Vista scar is deep, and I think it will take at least until Windows 8 for the damage to be undone from the public pounding it received.
-
Of course, that not what some people will say, stand by for the outlandish pro-Vista claims:
Posted by Goblin | December 9, 2008 4:40 PM
Microsoft might have missed the mark on the desktop but their new small business pbx / phone system kicks the snot out of the competition. Watch out for Response Point to sweep the SMB VoIP PBX market in Canada and the US in 2009.
Posted by Erik | December 9, 2008 11:48 PM
@Erik
I hope it sells very well for you. Maybe if you make enough posts like that you can generate enough sales for an extra holiday next year?
-
Best of luck.
Goblin.
Posted by Goblin | December 11, 2008 7:08 PM
Microsoft might have missed the mark on the desktop but their new small business pbx / phone system kicks the snot out of the competition.
Posted by araba oyunları | January 12, 2009 7:18 PM
The Vista scar is deep, and I think it will take at least until Windows 8 for the damage to be undone from the public pounding it received.
Posted by araba yarışı | January 12, 2009 7:19 PM