Why Microsoft Wrote aQuantive a Big Check
|
Microsoft's aQuantive acquisition is big, big, big. It's so big the software giant spent an uncharacteristically large amount of moneyfor Microsoft, anywayon the advertising company. |
Microsoft will pay $66.50 a share for aQuantive in an all-cash transaction valued at about $6 billion. That's big money, even for Microsoftand it's a big premium, too. aQuantive stock closed at $35.87 yesterday. This morning, the stock made big, big gainsup about 78 percent and close to Microsoft's paying pricein heavy trading. It's a big deal.
The selling price is big, because Microsoft rarely pays big and almost never well above the share price.
Adam Sohn, a director in Microsoft's Online Services group, agreed that the paying price is unusual for Microsoft.
"It was a unique deal for us in the size, historically," he said. "For sure, it's bigger than anyone expected this morning."
Microsoft's willingness to pay so much suggests the company believes that it can't build up its own ad platforms fast enough. Microsoft already built MSN adCenter, and it's just not fast enough.
Sohn put it differently, saying the size of the deal demonstrates Microsoft's "commitment" to advertising, which is a "key place of growth" for the company.
The deal comes less that 24 hours after WPP agreed to buy 24/7 Real Media. Microsoft had been a contender, as well, if rumors were true.
There's something that feels rushed about the aQuantive acquisition, given the big paying price and small amount of Microsoft information. The company held a short conference call this morning ahead of the stock market opening. The seeming hurriedness raises questions about how Microsoft quickly closed the aQuantive deal following the WPP-24/7 Real Media announcement.

Show Me the Money
Microsoft's advertising urgency is apparent, andas I blogged last month the company is on a buying spree, as seen from ScreenTonic and Tellme acquisitions as well as acquisition rumors about DoubleClick, which Google bought, and Yahoo.
Microsoft began its push against Google and more aggressively into search and advertising in early 2003, with reasonable expectation that infrastructure would be in place in time to capture online advertising dollars as they would eventually flow online.
Four years later, ad dollars are beginning to move online, Google is turning into an advertising powerhouse and Microsoft's Online Services group is struggling to catch up. It's starting to rain money online and Microsoft's little bucket is full of holes; meanwhile, Google has hauled out a dump truck to catch all the dough.
It's no wonder that Microsoft is willing to spendand uncharacteristically so with aQuantiveto get now what the software giant can't build fast enough for the near future. Some opportunities that have to concern Microsoft:
- Online display advertising is the fastest-growing category for ad spending, according to TNS Media Intelligence. Sohn said that advertisers would spend $40 billion online this year. Related, JupiterResearch reports that 26 percent of large advertisers plan to spend 25 percent more on search engine advertising this year.
- The online advertising opportunity is increasing for non-PC devices. For example, ABI Research forecasts that mobile advertising revenue will reach $3 billion by early 2008 and whopping $19 billion by 2011.
- Rich media is extending video from the big screen to smaller screensand coordinated advertising campaigns with them. aQuantive is superbly positioned for video.
- Advertising is increasingly multi-channel, as advertisers coordinate campaigns across different mediums, such as television, online banners, interactive Web sites and cell phones. Microsoft has software assets for these channels, but not the advertising tools or relationships to take on Google and traditional advertising companies. The aQuantive acquisition will give Microsoft greater advertising reach and deeper advertiser relationships.
- The online and multi-channel advertising opportunity is rapidly going global, with huge opportunities, such as the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, in large and emerging markets. In many of those emerging markets, it's the cell phone and not the PC that is the everyday Internet device.
Global Reach
Microsoft is well aware of the need to broaden its reach, whether global or device.
"Now we have the ability to serve ads up across the global Internet...and we get some amazing expertise [in aQuantive]," Sohn said.
Either aQuantive or 24/7 Real Media would have brought important assets to Microsoft, the latter obviously for much less investment. Microsoft is an aQuantive client and, based on some investigating I did last year, not with 24/7 Real Media. Also, "aQuantive is a local company, which we love," Sohn said.
From aQuantive, Microsoft will gain three valuable asset companies: Atlas, Avenue A | Razorfish and DRIVEpm. Atlas offers a broad range of tools for agencies, brand marketers, direct response marketers and publishers. Atlas also offers custom research, search campaign and site optimization tools. Avenue A | Razorfish is probably best known for its interactive, rich media advertising campaigns and professional services (which account for the bulk of aQuantive revenue). I am not that familiar with DRIVEpm, which provides tools connecting publishers to advertisers.
Microsoft is going to have to move quickly to get the best from the deal, which is expected to close during second half of 2007.
The deal changes Microsoft, dramatically, particularly because of aQuantive heavy services revenue base. Microsoft is no longer just a software company. Microsoft paid big money to add new dimension to its corporate character. I've called Google a one-trick pony, because its revenue comes almost totally from advertising and contextual search. Microsoft is more multidimensionaland much more so with the addition of aQuantive. Microsoft may be far behind its big search rival, but Google might want to start looking over its shoulder.
"We're looking for deep [advertising] assets that will really change the game," Sohn said.
He may be right.
Related Posts:
- Top 10 List: Why Microsoft and Yahoo Couldn't Marry, Microsoft Watch, May 5, 2007
- Will Microsoft Yell Yahoo, Microsoft Watch, May 4, 2007
- Microsoft Vies for the Third Screen, Microsoft Watch, May 3, 2007
- The Google Quandary, Microsoft Watch, April 24, 2007
- RIM Around the Rosies, Pocket Full of Posies, Microsoft Watch, April 23, 2007
- Digital Media Bundling 2.0, Microsoft Watch, April 16, 2007
- DoubleClick and Microsoft's Thrift Culture, Microsoft Watch, April 16, 2007
- Microsoft Reorganizes Search, Microsoft Watch, March 21, 2007
- Tellme About Dial Tone 2.0, Microsoft Watch, March 15, 2007
- Tell Me What? , Microsoft Watch, March 14, 2007
- Who Shot Windows Live?, Microsoft Watch, March 8, 2007
- Wanted: Dead or Live, Microsoft Watch, March 2, 2007
- What Is Microsoft's Services Platform?, Microsoft Watch, March 1, 2007


Comments (8)
Microsoft is a two-trick pony--Dimdows and Office. Everything else loses money. It's acquired companies in the past, which hasn't changed anything. Why should this one be different?
Posted by Lawrence D'Oliveiro | May 18, 2007 7:57 PM
Lawrence, its called Windows, and the aQuantive purchase shows Microsoft's willingness to compete despite Googles continued success in the online ad market. It also proves Microsoft is in this for the long run and overtime will probably be on the tier 1 level Google is now, but somehow, I suspect it could come at a cost over time.
Microsoft needs to have some strategic points to attack Google, but how do you change people from well known technology to MSN. I just can't stop using Google, I don't think I ever will, Live Search has some cool features though, especially its image search, but Google is like embedded in me. Live needs to also improve its performance, from Hotmail to Live Search its so slow and causes IE 7 to eat a lot memory. Performance is a number one factor why Live is still behind Google and Yahoo.
Still, the purchase seems like a desperate move by MS just to keep up with Google on the ad front. Gates once said that Netscape kept him up at night during 90's. Looks like Ballmer found something to keep him awake too.
Yes, it seems like wasted money, but will be recovered in a giffy through the cash cows Office and Windows. I bet Gates and Ballmer constantly curse themselves for not purchasing Google when Page and Brin were basically selling it for little or nothing back in the late 90's.
Posted by Andre Da Costa | May 19, 2007 12:25 AM
I have to wonder why this company and not doubleclick?
Posted by evan | May 19, 2007 5:52 AM
Yes, this acquisition is another strategic stroke of genius. It's right up there with Gates' purchase of WebTV for $450M, or about $45K per subscriber.
Gates and Ballmer are like two kids running a lemonade stand. They never go broke from bone-head decisions because a rich mommy (OS licenses) can always cough up cash to cover them.
And as usual, Microsoft shareholders will ultimately pay the freight because the board of directors has no collective spine.
Posted by Jim | May 19, 2007 2:28 PM
"I bet Gates and Ballmer constantly curse themselves for not purchasing Google when Page and Brin were basically selling it for little or nothing back in the late 90's."
What makes you think for a minute that Ballmer or Gates could have made Google a success, ie. a division with positive cash flow and growth? If they had purchased Google in 1999, today it would probably be a screwed-up mess of proprietary tie-ins because that is what Gates understands. Look at their track record, the only reason these clowns acquire other companies is to get them out of the market in hopes that Microsoft's inferior alternative might have a chance.
Posted by HTR | May 19, 2007 6:10 PM
I have to wonder why this company and not doubleclick?
Isn't doubleclick acquired by google recently?
Posted by Vukota | May 20, 2007 9:49 AM
Lawrence D'Oliveiro :
Quote;
"Microsoft is a two-trick pony--Dimdows and Office. Everything else loses money. It's acquired companies in the past, which hasn't changed anything. Why should this one be different?"
----------------------------------------------------
Well put. Actually Micro$oft is a one trick pony, as if not for Window$, we would probably be using Wordperfect or Lotus Smartsuit. Look at all the money M$ is losing on Xbox and the "Zune".
Clearly this is why M$ is focused on taking over web ads, as if windows ever dies, they won't have a product.
Posted by chips b malroy | May 20, 2007 11:24 PM
Microsoft is looking for their next cash cow. You would too if you saw the numbers. people are looking at the web as a place to do at least word processing which reminds me of the fabled NC's oh well Microsoft thinks it's an ad house now? fine I never liked them much as an OS vendor or any application okay Excel was impressive back in the 80's.
Oh and yes Double-lick became Google adwords a while back which is reason one for MS to sit up and take notice of little google. Now that ad spending is going there, MS needs to play catch up and they bought aQuantive. good for aQ I do enjoy watching the good guys win sometimes.
Posted by Clive | May 21, 2007 1:13 AM