iPhone: Enough Already
|
Apple's iPhone goes on sale one week from today and I can't wait. Finally, the hype and constant speculation will be over. |
I didn't use the word anticipation because, until people actually line up to buy the device, no one can really predict early demand. One thing is certain: The hype is out of control, which could actually hurt the iPhone at launch.
How excessive is the hype? For the iPhone-weary, Engadget offers RSS feeds with no iPhone news. A Google search for "iPhone" brings back nearly 9,000 news stories, a huge chunk of them just from this week. Meanwhile, iPhone sightings have become news stories, with bloggers posting pictures of Apple employees using their iPhones on the train to work. And CNBC has stirred up the debate over whether or not a highly read technology columnist will give the iPhone a good review.
Get a life, please! It's a freakin' cell phone.
The level of excitement about the iPhone is very similar to the level of excitement that surrounded the launch of Windows 95. In fact, before the iPhone, I don't recall another product that had been hyped as much, except for Windows 95. The big difference? Microsoft's own marketing fanned the flames of the Windows 95-hype, whereas the enthusiasm for the iPhone is more organic. The blogosphere surely is a factor and it has likely given Apple billions of dollars in free advertising.
Not that Apple is shirking its marketing obligations. At the end of May, the first iPhone commercials hit the small screen. Part of Apple's secret formula for the iPod's success: advertising and lots of it.
What other MP3 player have you ever seen advertised on TV, at least in the United States? It isn't just the cell phone market that's crowded; its advertising market is crowded as well. Verizon Wireless' marketing is particularly aggressive, including heavy rotations of commercials for the SongID feature that lets consumers identify and download music using their cell phones. Apple is wise to advertise, even with all the hype.
But where will all the hype lead? One expectation is long lines outside Apple and Cingular stores, just like the lines that formed when Windows 95 became available nearly 12 years ago. Everyone assumes the lines will be longme includedbut what if they're not? Or what if there are more gawkers than buyers? Nobody can say which it will be until the truly obsessed begin laying down their sleeping bags outside Apple and Cingular stores.
The good news is that Apple will have people lining up at the more civilized hour of 6 p.m. rather than Microsoft's midnight launch for Windows 95.
Yesterday, I sent an IM to Michael Gartenberg, JupiterResearch research director, about Windows 95, just as he hit post on a blog about the similarity of Win95 and iPhone hype. Like minds, I wrote.
"Great minds," Michael replied. I won't argue with that.
He nicely summed up why the iPhoneand not another mobile phoneis generating so much excitement:
"Windows 95 was a sea change, it performed the same functions for the most part as Windows 3.1 but did them far more elegantly (and on par with many of the features that had formerly differentiated Mac OS of that era). We're seeing some of that here with the iPhone as well."
I'll go even further and say that Windows 95 put the "personal" in the personal computer. Apple's new mobile is poised to do something similar. Cell phones are hugely personal devices, but user interface problems put limits on just how personal they can be. This afternoon, I got e-mail from Apple with link to an iPhone guided-tour video. Based on the video, this is one personal device like no other cell phone I've used (and that would be many).
I've looked at the iPhone with skeptical eyes for some time. But my skepticism is decreasing. This week's Apple announcements about the device's battery life and screen quality dismiss two of my biggest reservations about the iPhone. I'm still uncertain about usability, but the answer won't really come until early buyers use the iPhone for at least a couple of weeks.
It's worth it to Apple to be dismissing some of the negative speculative hype about the iPhonemost of which comes from observers that never handled the device:
- Lack of IT support: If the iPhone is as popular as the hype suggests, it's coming through the enterprise back door. IT didn't embrace BlackBerrys, Palms or Treos with arms wide open, either. Employees bought the devices and used them for work and personal purposes. "Official" support came much later. Is the iPhone ready for the enterprise? Duh, of course. It's a cell phone.
- No Exchange support: There's presumption about this, but Apple hasn't explicitly said. Mac OS X's Mail offers marvelous Exchange support and the iPhone client could be similar. If not, what's the big deal? Apple's iPhone supports IMAP and packs a full Web browser. If not IMAP, what about Outlook Web Access? I use the browser on my Nokia N95 to check e-mail. It's loads less hassle because the spam stays on the server.
- Security is deficient: How can analysts who have never used the iPhone trash its security? People plunking down six C bills for an iPhone aren't going to lose it. Employees are more likely to lose a laptop or a bulky corporate smart phone loaded with sensitive data. The greater security risk is going to be from portable device loss than from unsupported security policies. Actually, iPhone might be more secure than some other mobiles because of what's rumored to be missing, like Flash and (hopefully) JavaScript.
If the iPhone really turns out to be another Windows 95, the assault on IT is inevitable and will be soon in coming. I'm assuming the device will live up to the hype, which will be hard given how much hype there is.
I'm still undecided about getting one. I love my Nokia N95 for one, and I expect demand could exceed supply. I've toyed with covering the launch from Apple's first retail store at Tysons Corner mall in Virginia, since I covered the store's opening more than six years ago. But if I stake out the store as a journalist, I'll probably lose any chance of buying an iPhone as a consumer.
Will you buy the iPhone? If so, right away? And, if you plan to buy one right away, what's your buying strategy? Please share with the class. Our comment lines are open.
Related Posts:
- An iPhone Skeptic Speaks Out, Microsoft Watch, June 11, 2007
- An Apple a Day..., Microsoft Watch, June 11, 2007
- Microsoft Scratches the Surface, Microsoft Watch, May 30, 2007
- A Smarter Smart Phone?, Microsoft Watch, May 22, 2007
- Tell Me About Dial Tone 2.0, Microsoft Watch, March 15, 2007
- Where's the 'You' in iPhone?, Microsoft Watch, January 10, 2007
- Apple's Son of Newton, Microsoft Watch, January 9, 2007


Comments (14)
"Please, get a life. It's a freakin' cell phone." Well said!
The more a product is hyped, the less I want to buy it. It's just a turn off.
As a practical matter, I'm not about to change to Cingular/AT&T. In my region, Cingular is dead last in J.D. Power Call Quality Satisfaction. They are also poorly rated in Customer Care Satisfaction and Billing Satisfaction.
In addition, among other things, I'm skeptical of the iPhone's touch-screen interface.
Posted by TomT | June 22, 2007 7:35 PM
How can you possibly think JavaScript may be "rumored to be missing" from the iPhone? You're generally clueless, but can't you even read? Geez.
Posted by anona | June 23, 2007 1:57 AM
Joe-
I kinda think the hype has been muted. That's given that me and my closest friends, including my wife and a few other intimates, have put off new phone purchases since the announcement.
Sales will roar! Beyond anything we have known.
Posted by Sam Hiser | June 23, 2007 7:29 AM
Yes, it will be a total failure, just like iPod. If you need any proof that the boyz in Redmond are worried, just read Gartner's latest "threatdown" (thanks Colbert) warning IT shops not to even look at the iPhone packaging -- it's that dangerous!
Posted by Ed T | June 23, 2007 11:47 AM
The iPhone does not support 3rd party apps except "web apps" written for Safari. So the iPhone is useless as a platform and Smartphones running Windows or Symbian are far more interesting.
I'd also prefer a video player that support several standard formats rather than a "Youtube player".
But by far the most important point for me is that I hate devices that only have a touchscreen.
And last but bot least is tie iPhone too big for the pants pocket.
Posted by Andre | June 23, 2007 1:03 PM
Andre wants a video player "that support several standard formats". I guess iPhone's H.264/mpeg-4 is just too restrictive - it's only an ISO standard used by hundreds of companies on thousands of devices - LOL!
And "last but bot least" he doesn't have room in his pants for an iPhone. Probably true -- they are so tight the blood flow to his brain has been severely restricted.
Posted by jerry | June 23, 2007 4:19 PM
Joe,
You're still an idiot.
Posted by WildSignals | June 23, 2007 11:38 PM
I think Mr wilcox should be barred from writing anything that has absolutely nothing to do with microsoft especially for something that is called "microsoft watch. I mean either that or rename this thing to "anything but microsoft watch" he obviously likes writing about google, apple, linux and whoever else a lot more.
Posted by me | June 24, 2007 12:06 AM
Joe,
I appreciate the work you put into all your articles, keeping informed of the competition is also an important part of investing. Lately it seems that more and more investors are stressed and critical of everyone elses opinions.
After years of being dragged through the mud VCSY has finally showed signs that they will be moving from the OTC to the Nasdaq. Sounds unbelievable when you see it at under 3 cents today but after 7 years the "World" has finally caught up to their technology! It will soon be known that many are using it, IBM, Verizon, Google Microsoft, Apple and others, just some without permission. If my calculations are correct, Microsoft will be announcing that they settled their lawsuit and signed licensing agreements with VCSY by July 13th, sending them towards the Nasdaq!
Posted by T.B Light | June 24, 2007 3:21 AM
Joe;
Keep up the good work and bringing out things of interest that may be just outside the immediate realm of "Microsoft." I wouldn't worry about the "limited minds" and "limited scope" and "sensless" comments by others in this comment section.
As far as the hype of this product from Apple goes, I don't really care if it sells big or not, people will buy anything these days -- I know I am one who purchased a G5 IPod and I love it -- But that's me... =;o)
Posted by Douglas S. Taylor | June 24, 2007 11:00 AM
I don't see why people can't wait to get this iPhone. It's true that it looks great but from other side I heard numbers of people which are saying that Apple made revolution in Mobile world with iPhone; wait a minute, what than we should say for Palm and smart phones with Windows Mobile system which are available on market few years. These phones enables us to surf on internet, read emails, listen music, watch videos, and what is most important with some of them you can even get real keyboard, not like on iPhone, where you will have touch screen. I think that we really expect too much from iPhone and it will not be nothing different compared with stuffs we already so.
Posted by Windows | June 24, 2007 2:44 PM
Joe, Microsft Watch means you are literally assigned to watch, monitor and analyze Microsoft direction , products , raodmaps and report back to us .
What iPod got to do with Microsof Watch ?
You may start your Apple Watch in other column but please pass your job to someone interested in professionlly reporting Microsoft news
Please reply publicly to us
Posted by Eder | June 24, 2007 9:22 PM
eder, I don't think most know what to think of the 180 Microsoft has done in the last couple of weeks. I believe it has to do with gaining a new foothold by signing licencing agreements with VCSY, a company who has been operating in stealth over the last 6 years. There patents were years ahead of their time, you'll here more about them soon, I'M SURE!
Posted by T.B Light | June 24, 2007 10:33 PM
Oh your missing the entire point the iphone does absolutly nothing that the thosands of windows mobile powered smartphones do and have done consistently for the last decade .
Not only that but it lacks any application support unlike .Net capible windows mobile and on top of all that it costs twice as much as its compiters .
Has the whole world gone insane ? Awnser me this one question if the iphone was made by anyone ewlse other than apple would we be talking about it now ?
I think not , Its a dud product with a bloated pricetag thats all.
Posted by Raymond | June 25, 2007 2:02 PM