eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
February 12, 2008 1:54 PM

Microsoft's Mobile Madness



News Comentary. Let's do some math. Microsoft estimates that the Windows PC install base will reach 1 billion in 2008. Analysts say that cell phone shipments exceed 1 billion units, every year. Which computing platform is greater than the other?

Surprisingly, the math adds up against Microsoft, which, for all its recent mobile acquisitions and hostile Yahoo takeover attempt, isn't mobile enough. Microsoft has got the right idea about what's needed to win in the mobile market, but the company moves too slowly.

This morning, my Linux-Watch colleague Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, suggested to me that Microsoft really announced nothing at this year's Mobile World Congress, which is underway now in Barcelona. I rebuffed him, because of the Danger acquisition, Sony Ericsson deal and expanded Windows Live developer platform.

But on deeper consideration, for once I agree with SJVN. The big news was everywhere else. Microsoft's mobile announcements are nothing compared to others, particularly Google's search deal with Nokia.

Here's the problem: Microsoft's recent acquisitions, including Danger, and Mobile World Congress announcements are about the future. Other significant mobile announcements are about today. When is Microsoft going to get the hell out of the 1990s? The company built its businesses on promises—what Microsoft would do tomorrow as distraction from competitors' announcements today. That strategy worked, for marketing purposes, during Microsoft's infancy. Tomorrow promises are now ingrained in the Microsoft corporate lexicon. The Internet Age is fast moving&151;it's about today—while Microsoft lumbers along like an aged elephant.

It's madness that Microsoft's mobile strategy isn't more advanced, particularly since its three-screen approach—mobile phones, PCs and TVs—is right on. For what reason did Microsoft buy ScreenTonic or TellMe? I've got a question for Microsoft, posed by its now abandoned marketing motto: "Where do you want to go today?" Microsoft talks loads about tomorrow, when competition is today. It's corporate madness—no, utter delusional behavior.

The future of mobiles is PC replacement. It's an inevitable outcome and one Microsoft simply isn't accepting. Microsoft's denial is madness, too.

The cellular phone market is:

  • Enormously bigger than that for PCs. For every PC in use there are three cell phones, based on analyst estimates of 3 million mobiles in 2007.
  • Captive, as most people carry mobiles most of the time; but not PCs.
  • Personal, because people care more about their cell phones than PCs. Who asks to be buried with their computers, but it's a common request for mobiles.
  • More global, as more people are likely to have cell phones than PCs, particularly in emerging markets.
  • More connected than PCs, as cellular services reach many places than does the wired or Wi-Fi Internet.

The advertising potential is enormous, particularly because of search. Carriers have been somewhat cautious about placing mobile ads, because of customer concerns. But search is one place where consumers are used to advertising and may even welcome it. Nielsen Online calls local search the "top search objective," and that's one place where local advertising or contextual keywords would be beneficial to mobile users. There, Google is quickly pushing ahead of Microsoft.

As for the broader advertising potential, sometimes the name says it all. Last year, IDC released a report, "U.S. Mobile Marketing and Advertising 2007-2011 Forecast: The Potential Actually Exceeds the Hype." Several analysts estimate that the mobile advertising market will reach $10 billion by 2010. I think those estimates are too conservative. Increased competition in the mobile content market will drive faster mobile advertising initiatives, particularly as Google, Microsoft and Yahoo vie to be there first.

Additionally, the Web 2.0 platform is rapidly shifting its directional focus. There's too much Microsoft headwind on the PC, but not on the mobile phone, particularly with Symbian and not Windows Mobile being the dominant operating system. Web-based applications, either hosted solely on the Net or using light local connected clients, are more suited to mobiles, because of their device character and the missing Microsoft monopoly.

Microsoft talks, but, for example, Google and Yahoo mobile search announcements walk. Microsoft promises won't hold back competitors. It's madness to believe your own promises over and over again, when there is little or nothing behind them.

See, SJVN and I can agree on something.

Related Posts:

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/12698

Comments (8)

Joe wrote...

"It's madness that Microsoft's mobile strategy isn't more advanced, particularly since its three-screen approach—mobile phones, PCs and TVs—is right on. For what reason did Microsoft buy ScreenTonic or TellMe? I've got a question for Microsoft, posed by its now abandoned marketing motto: "Where do you want to go today?" Microsoft talks loads about tomorrow, when competition is today. It's corporate madness—no, utter delusional behavior."

Yes, sir, right on both counts. Will Gates and his boy companion, Steve Ballmer should of went fishing together a few years ago.

Keep on writing Joe, this is what I come here for is to read about Microsoft and the opinions of the readers here.

Thank you Joe for a very clear analysis of what is truly ailing Microsoft. They are missing the boat and this ridiculous attempt at buying Yahoo will continue to distract them from the real issue.

The main thing that should have come from Microsoft out of MWC was Windows Mobile 6.1 and it being available right NOW for downloads for current Windows Mobile users. Nothing else should have been talked about. Nothing else should matter to Microsoft than making sure Windows Mobile is the mobile OS for today and tomorrow.

Since they seem to have the PC locked down, the whole company should be committed to doing everything it can to make Windows Mobile the preferred system to go on all of those billions of phones to be sold.

Bill Gates already missed the opportunity at CES, why is the latest version of WinMo still missing in action?

63 :

Google's nokia deal wasn't much, considering Nokia also has the same deal with yahoo and microsoft. If anything, it shows google as last, in the pack.

wan_link :

You're a terrible "journalist" Joe.

I will enjoy deleting the Microsoft Watch feed from my feeds list!

When you start adding value to IT news and information I'll be happy to consider revisiting your site.

Joe :

63 wrote: "Google's nokia deal wasn't much."

You're right that Yahoo and Microsoft have Nokia deals--as did Google. Watch for what comes next, which I expect to be local search benefits for Google. Take a look at Nokia's local search providers, which aren't listed as Microsoft or Yahoo.

Joe

63 :

Good point, but another detail worth remembering... is that we are talking 1 or 2 nokia phone models (most likely, although i have no way of knowing for sure).

Joe :

63 wrote: "We are talking 1 or 2 nokia phone models."

Right, it's a few models, preloaded, because those will be new models. But Nokia's search software is easily downloadable for existing phones. I grabbed the Americas version today to see the search providers.

Joe

63 :

the theory of default software... says those incremental downloads won't amount to many.

Post a Comment

 
 


RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise