eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
April 2, 2009 2:26 PM

Netbooks, Windows Phones Take the CTIA Stage



News Analysis. Microsoft sees a big future for subsidized netbooks, so said Robbie Bach, Entertainment and Devices president, during today's CTIA keynote.

By 2012, "A third of these netbooks PCs will be sold by mobile operators," he claimed. Really? Only one-third? I think that number is conservative. I most recently blogged about Windows and netbooks, yesterday.

arrow.gifGOT A TIP OR RUMOR?

Robbie spoke about "connected experiences" across three screens—PC, TV and mobile device. Three screens is not a new strategy for Microsoft, but it is one that had been languishing until lately. This week's Microsoft announcements about connected content for AT&T U-Verse and about Windows Phones are signs of improving momentum.

Robbie spent some time talking about where PCs intersect the handset market: netbooks. He acknowledged the sudden growth of the fairly new netbook category, for which he credited the weak economy as one factor driving sales. Robbie described netbooks, or what analysts call mini-notebooks, as a "bright spot" in the PC market. "Almost all these netbook PCs are connected."

That's true, and it's the importance for the CTIA crowd. As I've blogged before, there is an inevitable convergence coming, at least the business model, for smartphones and netbooks. Like smartphones, mini-notebooks will have 3G and Wi-Fi radios and be carrier-subsidized.

Robbie claimed that Windows ships on 90 percent of mini-notebooks, which will only get better. "You're going to see these machines become full-blown PCs in a connected world," he said. For many people, they already are, I say. Windows 7 will matter as much, if not more, than hardware improvements.

arrow.gifeWEEK Labs Takes a First Look at Windows Mobile 6.5

Robbie shifted from netbooks to handsets, starting with marketing. Like other Microsoft products, marketing will be "an approach around choice." I've raved about "Start" marketing. It works on so many levels.

"Windows Phones are a natural extension" to Windows and Windows Live, Robbie asserted. They will be "connected through cloud-based services."

Next came the obligatory Windows Mobile 6.5 demo, showcasing many features already revealed at World Mobile Congress. Among Windows Mobile 6.5 new features:

  • Redesigned UI that makes major functions, such as calendar and alerts, easily accessible from the home screen, without navigating submenus.
  • Brand new lock screen, tied to alerts. On a touchscreen phone, a tap brings up the list of alerts, for text messages, e-mail, voice mail, etc. The user can tap whichever alert to unlock the phone. This eliminates submenus.
  • Voice flicks, which lets users record snippets and send them like text messages. That's a catch-up feature with Nokia and third-party developers.
  • Flash Lite support, which Microsoft touts as a major differentiator for fully using Website content. It is for iPhone, but Flash Lite is available for other mobile operating systems or browsers.
  • Dedicated Start key, which, like the PC, brings up all the phone's applications. Start key removes yet another layer or two of submenus.
  • Bundled apps include Facebook, MySpace and Sim City, among others.
  • Microsoft My Phone also is bundled on the phone. The sync service allows the end user to interact with and modify content from the Web service, rather than just sync it. The approach is better than Apple's MobileMe, but not necessarily as flexible as Nokia's Ovi services. Nor are Microsoft's announced sync features on par with MobileMe.
  • Designer screens. Microsoft will provide fashion themes for personalizing/skinning the user interface.

The user interface changes are ones that matter. Windows Mobile, like Symbian OS, requires too much tapping through submenus to get at important stuff. I'll be interested to see just how far the UI changes go beyond what Microsoft has shown over the last month. Second and third—really tied for importance—are Web browsing and the mobile application store. If Microsoft can deliver, and get v6.5 on many handsets quickly, Windows Mobile may yet reverse its downward user experience and developer interest decline against Apple and Google.

[Please send your tips or rumors to watchtips at gmail.com.]

Related Posts:

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/16803

Comments (5)

smist08 :

It seems to be a battle. Can the Windows monopoly spread to mobile devices? Or can mobile device OS's spread to PCs.
MS has a beachhead in phoneland with WM. Admittedly a weak one, under heavy attack.
We are starting to see demos of NetBooks running phone OS's like Android (which is really Linux). MS is fighting back with things like Windows Lame (Starter) Edition.
Anyway nice to see some hot competition in the OS market for a change.

Paul :

If Bach is leading the effort they're in trouble.

Marco :

As always MS is copying the idea (does it have original ideas?)

Google CEO Eric Schmidt on Subsidized Netbooks, Mobile TV Plans
ostatic.com/blog/google-ceo-eric-schmidt-on-subsidized-netbooks-mobile-tv-plans

Mar. 12, 2009

We've written before about successful efforts to put Google's Linux-based Android operating system on netbooks, and E-Ink devices. Now, according to OSnews, Google CEO Eric Schmidt has backed up the idea that he is closely watching the netbook space, where Android-based netbooks are predicted to arrive soon. Schmidt also predicts that netbooks could be subsidized to allow for ultra-low buy-in costs. Additionally, Schmidt recently appeared on the Charlie Rose show on PBS, and discussed Google's plans to enter the mobile TV market. What does all this mean for Android?

---------------
BTW: It's a bad idea for MS (it sell software) and good for Google (it sell advertising)


-----------------------
At last the MS' problem is itself

Microsoft's Negative Brand Image Gets Worse
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2344107,00.asp
Quote:
I could be wrong, but Microsoft did bring out some nifty phones way before anyone else and was reamed over the devices. The fact is, the brand name "Microsoft" carries baggage and negative connotations. I'm not sure the company is even remotely aware of it. And it's way too late to rebrand the company. The Xbox brand is used effectively but simply won't do for the rest of the operation.

Microsoft has let this brand deterioration creep up. I'd like to see some real studies done by researchers not funded by Microsoft to see the extent of the damage and whether it is irreparable. But try my "what-if" game for yourself with both Microsoft products and other products and you'll come to the same conclusions. The Microsoft label doesn't help the image. And why is that?

koppypoppy :

Seriously folks, why does anyone read this distorted blog. I am over this crud of gutter journalismn that Joe calls a job. This Microsoft shill is just perpetuating crap so he doesnt lose his income, and seriously guys what does Joe know about technology or how companies use technology. His inconsistent comments and gutter crap about how good his masters Microsoft are and how crap Linux is should go and die some place. The time for this garbage is over and the time for real informed reasoning is here. The time to take a stand and stop this monopoly taking over just because they have some money is here. If you are serious about linux start taking action. Stop reading this crap. Get a book about something, GTK+ QT C PYTHON anything open source and learn and use and stop wasting time. Get to the point where you can contribute to the goal of free software and open source. Do something stop perpetuating Joe and his gutter crap comments. You can do it, now.
Lastly, Joe go get an education.

Fairpoint :

Microsoft has done a terrible job in the mobile world. No reason to beleive they will improve and based on competition, there is reason to beleive they will lose share. Over a decade since wireless became pervasive and the number one desktop email software has been a non-factor in the wireless world ceding success to RIM and Blackberry in North America. Nokia remains dominant in EU. Mobile Asia is another story altogether. Win CE and mobile remains heavy and battery intensive compared to other leading mobile OSs. As for Windows on netbooks - lower battery life and feeble services and software choice are the hallmarks. I wish they would get mobile right. Microsoft has done an excellent job of getting on netbooks displacing linux. Wonder whether that is simply the consumer choosing the familiar or something Microsoft has actually done.

Post a Comment

 
 
RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise