eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
September 6, 2007 12:27 PM

The Pod Squad



Microsoft and its partners should take product strategy pointers from Apple's new mop top crop of iPods.

Yesterday, Apple hugely refreshed its iPod product line, introducing a squat nano with video, touch-screen iPod with Wi-Fi and Wi-Fi music store. Apple also reduced price of the 8GB iPhone by $200.

The problem with a successful product like the iPod is saturation. There comes a point where most people that want one have one. But through many years of marginal market share, where major buyers were die hard Mac fans, Apple honed skills of selling to the same people over and over again. Now the company is applying similar product and marketing tactics to the mass market.

Yesterday's product line refresh is a blueprint for offering more for less—and, more importantly, something better. As I explained before in my six principles for successful technology products: To displace a successful product, the new one has to be a whole lot better. Today I'm adding a seventh principle: The product must make people feel better about themselves.

Microsoft has taken a different tack. Through its integration strategy, the company has sometimes offered more, but not necessarily better and not often for lower price. Microsoft's measure for lower cost has been competing products. That strategy worked while Office and Windows gained market share, but now Microsoft is competing with its own desktop products. Microsoft's solution: Offer more and charge more, as it has done with new Office and Windows SKUs, particularly Enterprise editions.

The approach is a long-term marketing loser, because there is no emotional hook. Vista TCO studies have no emotional appeal—and even IT managers make some product decisions based on how they feel about a company, brand or product. If Jack the midsize business owner has to pay more for Vista Enterprise and extra for Software Assurance to get the operating system, how good is he going to feel about Microsoft or the partner doing the selling? Someday someone else will fill that emotional vacuum.

Joe's Seven Principles of Successful Technology Products

One successful exception is Office Student and Teacher Edition, where Microsoft essentially repackaged Office Standard for about $250 less. The student version of Office is the top-selling productivity suite at retail, according to NPD. Microsoft offered more over its then mainstay consumer offering Works, while charging much less compared to Office Standard or any other version of the productivity suite.

Microsoft had better be more concerned about offering more for less and making customers feel good about themselves—and in the process the company and its brands. Office 2007 offers a little of the latter, because many documents are easier to produce and more easily dressed up. Users can get an emotional zing from that prettier PowerPoint and the reaction making their presentation. What a wonder if PowerPoint could magically improve the presenter's speaking skills, too.

More Is Less Is More
The new iPod nano is good example of Apple offering more for less, and some feel good with it. For people looking for video in a small size and lower price, the new squat iPod nano is $149 in silver color. Apple lowered the price by $50 from the thin and tall nano, while greatly extending the features. Video is a huge feature enhancement for the lower price.

There is a place to ask for more, and it relates to helping people feel good about themselves. Apple learned from the black iPod and colored iPod nanos that people will pay more for color. Style matters; it makes people feel good about themselves and how others see them. In a brash, marketing move last year, Apple offered a black MacBook. Functionally, the notebook was the same as the white MacBook. But customers paid $150, just for the color.

People wanting a colored nano will have to pay $50 more, but in a sense it's still less. Apple boosted storage of the $199 model to 8GB, which capacity previously cost an extra $50, while adding video as a big extra. More is less is more.

The new iPod Touch is a surprise product, because the media player is really an iPhone without telephony. Starting price is $100 less than the 8GB iPhone, which price dropped from $599 to $399. The iPod Touch offers more, as in the touch screen, but for less cost than iPhone, including contractual obligation costs to AT&T. For people wanting more storage capacity, Apple redesigned the classic iPod and reduced the price of the 80GB model to $249. A massive 160GB model sells for $349.

Apple has created compelling reasons for many people who bought iPods before to buy again—and for iPhone hold outs to make the purchase. It's a good approach for an increasingly saturated market. More is less is more.

IT Managers are People, Too
But Apple also will face increasing challenges as even more people buy iPods and the media player market commoditizes. While Dell lacks Apple's design panache, the PC manufacturer has done well by offering more for less. However, commodization of the PC market—and subsequent rock-bottom pricing—has more recently hurt Dell. The key to Apple's continued iPod success or Dell's revival will be people.

Enterprises are made up of people, and IT managers are consumers, too. It's too easy for developers or manufacturers to treat either enterprises or IT organizations as amorphous inanimate things. But they are real people making real purchase decisions.

Microsoft should more seriously consider how it reaches these people in and out of the office—and that means getting more of the emotional hook, or helping customers feel better about themselves. Jack IT manager or Jane the executive may use Microsoft software at work, but they're real fun—and stronger emotional attachment—may be the iPod or iPhone they use at home. Microsoft should want those people buying Zune or its other consumer products. Zune price dropped $50 to $199 yesterday, ahead of Apple's announcement. Now the music player looks clunky compared to new iPods.

Buying decisions for the home do affect those made for the office. How much of HP corporate printer sales derive from products sold to consumers, who also happen to be IT buyers? And the marketing to one market absolutely influences purchases for the other.

Microsoft shouldn't have to be told this. Microsoft has huge advantages over Apple, such as the software's cost to produce compared to commodity hardware. The software giant can charge whatever it wants and reduce pricing the way it did with Student and Teacher Edition. But that's not enough. A new software version has to be a whole lot better than the old one, and the product must help people feel good about themselves.

Related Posts:


TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/11673

Comments (17)

Waethorn :

"the product must help people feel good about themselves."

i bet the people that spent hours in the lineup for the iPhone probably feel good about themselves after Apple announced the $200 price drop.

....like this guy:

http://www.nonsequiturs.com/images/content/id1034_1.jpg

Paul :

Er, Joe. Did you notice that AAPL went down $7+ on all this good strategy you're suggesting MSFT follow?

Waethorn :

someone pointed out elsewhere that that was the second keynote this quarter that preceeded a plummet for Apple stock.

Waethorn :

"Apple's new mop top crop of iPods"

too bad there was no Beatles announcement, otherwise your pun might have actually made some sense, Joe! ;)

Nick :

I bought two iPhones first week it was launched for my wife and myself. Would I like to save $400? Yeah, of course, but I already had two awesome months with it. There will always be whiners. But there are also people that do realize stuff just get cheaper.

As for AAPL stocks, if you bought just before iPhone launch, I doubt you are freaking out about the $7+ drop.

Waethorn :

"Would I like to save $400? Yeah, of course, but I already had two awesome months with it."

So was it worth it to pay $200/month/device + your AT&T bills just to brag about being an early adopter? Someone needs to shake some sense into that head of yours.

"if you bought just before iPhone launch, I doubt you are freaking out about the $7+ drop"

Actually it had equated to anywhere from a 6-8% depreciation according to which stock analysis you read.

Waethorn :

"$200/month/device" should read "$100/month/device"

I'll just wait till the 3rd or 4th generation, which is usually how apple stuff works.

Nick :

Huh? How much an object/service is worth is subjective you know. I wasn't trying to brag about being an early adopter. What is there to brag about? It's just a freaking cell phone. As for saving $400 or $100/month/device or whatever, I guess I just have a lot of money to burn. Like I said, it's subjective. And I like to think I am a very sensible person. TYVM.

Anyway, I am not defending Apple. The only reason I am reading MS watch, ironically, is that I do own a lot of MSFT shares. :(

truth_bearer :

For anyone who actually watches AAPL, it *always* falls after a Steve Jobs keynote or media event. It's nothing new, or anything to worry about.

It will rebound over the holiday quarter as all those stockings get filled with $149 iPod Nanos.

Waethorn :

"I guess I just have a lot of money to burn."

"And I like to think I am a very sensible person."

"It's just a freaking cell phone."

Now you're contradicting yourself. Seriously, you need help!

"For anyone who actually watches AAPL, it *always* falls after a Steve Jobs keynote or media event."

I seem to recall that it rose briefly after the iPhone announcement. So how does that play into your analysis?

Nick :

Wow you are the one that needs help if all you do is troll internet forum.

How the heck am I contradicting myself? I am very lucky in that I don't have to worry about money. I don't tell Bill Gates to get some help for spending millions on a home. He probably thinks his mansion is just a freaking home too that we shouldn't care about it.

Did you buy an iPhone? If you did, start your own blog and whine about it. Nobody will stop you.

I don't like whiners and trolls. If you weren't trolling, my apology. You have your likes and not-likes and that's fine.

Anyway, I am done with this thread.

Wes McGee :

Most likely the drop in AAPL stemmed more from reaction from the sudden price cut of the iPhone (The Street is reasonably concerned that Apple may have overestimated demand and that they wouldn't make their target by the end of the quarter. Customers are pissed that their $600 product could now be had for $400, and Steve Jobs rather cavalier attitude about it -- "that's how technology works", which did little to quell the backlash... now he is forced to offer a $100 store credit in hopes of containing the PR disaster.)

Quite frankly, if the story was just limited to iPods, I would bet the stock would have shot up yesterday and today. On that front, I agree with Joe about how Apple excels in marketing and selling essentially the same thing to the same people over and over again.

But back to the Jobs' iPhone blunder, I do find it amazing that people can fall so much in love with Apple computer that they think Apple is their friend rather than a for-profit company, and the converse with Microsoft (Apple fanatic John Gruber just likened Microsoft to Lex Luthor.). Neither company is your "friend"... they both have as their goal to separate you from your money. Steve Jobs can be just as much of a dick as people say Microsoft is (look at every veiled insult he lobbed at AT&T when he was talking up the iPod Touch... ). He pretty much burns every partner he teams up with sooner or later. Steve Jobs is the more complete Luthor as he has one quality that no public figure at Microsoft has -- charisma.

Gerardo Tasistro :

Waethorn I have to agree with Nick. Being first adopter can be very beneficial and 200 bucks extra can end up being a drop in a bucket. It is after all a publicity add. It says you like to be ahead, to innovate and try new things. Now I don't know what Nick does for a living, but we are a walking publicity add. People look at us and start to make judgments out of looks and Steve Jobs lives off that. I know because I'm a Mac owner too and believe me these things are eye poppers. You walk into a meeting and people stare at you, people ask you questions etc. Its like an automatic conversation starter and can lead to more business talk. If I had an equally priced VAIO with probably better performance I'd be one of the crowd.

Machead number 1 :

The amount of Mac envy from the Microsoft fanboys is very evident here, as they cannot attack it enough. Admit it people, the Ipod is on the top of the heap, and the Zune is a dismal failure at best.

JohnJ :

The iPod is an obvious success, but the Mac remains a market share failure.

HP has a 19.3% worldwide personal computer share, with 36.5% growth. Now *there* is a company that is doing something right.

Worldwide, the Apple-Mac's share is in the Others category, behind five other companies.

snyder73 :

YASA VOB to iPod Converter is an expert and easy-to-used to convert VOB files to iPod converter.It has the ability to convert VOB into iPod Video and other various video formats.

www.vob-converter.com

Post a Comment

 
 
RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise