Another View of Vista Business Adoption
|
Earlier today, direct-marketing reseller CDW released survey results indicating that many businesses will take the slow road to Windows Vista adoption. The majority of surveyed IT managers indicated their businesses would need to make costly hardware upgrades--presumably new PC purchases--to support Microsoft's flagship operating system. |
While CDW put a positive spin on the numbers--proclaiming that "86 percent of respondents plan to upgrade to Vista"--the overall response forebodes business upgrade plans. Twenty percent of survey respondents "would start deployment" within 12 months, said Terry Fink, CDW manager of marketing development.
Starting deployment is a long way from actually moving Windows Vista to production systems.
CDW commissioned Walker Interactive, which surveyed 761 IT managers from all size businesses and government and educational institutions, for the study. Respondents "identified themselves as being somewhat familiar with Windows Vista," which potentially skews the findings. "Somewhat" is somewhat vague, and Windows Vista familiarity means the survey may have overlooked IT managers unfamiliar with the operating system. Now, what do they plan to do about Windows Vista?
Only 2 percent of surveyed IT managers had a "detailed scheduled plan," with another 24 percent either with a tentative plan or one in the making. "Virtually everybody needs a plan," said Fink. Seventy-nine percent of respondents--IT managers familiar with Windows Vista--had yet to evaluate any pre-release version of the operating system.
Good news for CDW and other channel partners selling hardware: 51 percent of surveyed IT managers said their organization would need to upgrade or replace half their systems to "become Vista compatible." However, the news isn't as good for Microsoft, if businesses invest in new hardware before moving to Windows Vista. Today, eWeek Security Center Editor Larry Seltzer gave some reasons why many businesses would need to upgrade hardware to run Windows Vista.
Microsoft is decidedly optimistic about upgrade intentions. From a spokesperson statement today: "Businesses typically bring new operating systems into their environments more slowly than consumers, but we think businesses will adopt Windows Vista faster than any previous operating system...We're seeing a great deal of demand from businesses for a new operating system that addresses their evolving needs, which is why we say Windows Vista will be the fastest adopted operating system by businesses ever. The report announced by CDW today appears to support these projections."
Microsoft will officially launch Windows Vista for businesses in 17 days, and it's reasonable to ask what IT organization would test and deploy Windows Vista over the holidays. To that question Gartner analyst Michael Silver answered, "Only the die hards." He added: "The people who need to get off Windows 2000 will be in the labs [over the holidays]." Gartner recently conducted an informal survey assessing businesses' Windows Vista adoption plans. Most IT managers said they would move Windows Vista to end-user production systems starting in fourth quarter 2007. However, IT managers from larger enterprises indicated second quarter 2008.


Comments (7)
Where's Joe Wilcox's picture?
Posted by Mighty Joe Young | November 14, 2006 10:08 AM
Where's Joe Wilcox's picture?
Posted by Mighty Joe Young | November 14, 2006 10:08 AM
Where's Joe Wilcox's picture?
Posted by Mighty Joe Young | November 14, 2006 10:08 AM
Where's Joe Wilcox's picture?
Posted by Mighty Joe Young | November 14, 2006 10:08 AM
No compeling reason to go to Vista from XP Pro SP2.
Vista has IP6 and built in peer-to-peer.
To get the most out of GUI (Areo) the video card needs DirectX 9.0b and Pixel Shader 2.0 support.
Just saw one at Fry's for $180.00.
Vista does degrade gracefully. But I do not see Win 98 folks loading it on their computers.
Lets do simple math.
Vista Basic $199.00.
Video card $180.00.
Sub total $379.00
Tax 8%( ? ) 30.32
$409.32
Get a new system with printer on sale for $600.00.
Not worth it.
Wait for Service Pack one to come out.
Posted by Beach Bum | November 14, 2006 1:04 PM
My small company will be switching to Vista. Our oldest computers are from 2002 and 100% of those computers will be very quickly replaced in Q1 2007 with Vista preloaded. About 20% of our computers are from 2002.
Final decision has not been made on our 2005 computers, either Vista will be added or the computers will be replaced with Vista preloaded. As about 60% of our computers are from 2005, this group will be the most costly and/or time consuming. Most likely will happen in Q2 2007, though could slip to Q3 (depending upon financials).
2006 computers have Intel Core2's, 2 Meg RAM etc. 2006 computers will have Vista added to the units. Most likely Q1 2007 immediately following the replacement of the 2002 computers.
Surveys are meaning less unless there is an explaination to the participants answers.
Posted by SteveD | November 16, 2006 1:00 AM
My company (of approximately two-thousand desktops) will not be moving to Vista until at least 2008. Our hardware deployment calls for the next cycle of desktop replacements to take place in mid-2007, and those machines will still have XP installed.
There is no compelling business reason for my firm to perform in-place hardware upgrades on my existing machines to accelerate Vista deployment.
In speaking to my top 5 application vendors, their readiness plans call for Vista-compatible versions to be released in mid- to late-2007. I also expect at least one service pack of Vista to be released by then.
Though our deployment planning (which we began with RC1) will be completed by Q2 2007, only after the above two milestones are reached will we begin to install the OS.
By comparison to our Win 3.x -> 95 migration, and our 95 -> XP migration, our XP -> Vista migration will be a slight bit more aggressive.
Posted by Eric Hosle | November 21, 2006 2:27 PM