eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
January 4, 2007 5:08 PM

Windows Vista: More Work in Progress



Today, Gartner analyst Michael Silver asked, "Will Vista be done by 30 January 2007?" His answer: "No."

The question and answer might seem strange given that Microsoft released Windows Vista gold code in early November and launched the software for businesses on the 30th of that month. I called alarm about six weeks ago that Vista is really a work in progress.

In his blog post, Silver raised similar concerns as Microsoft Watch readers--application compatibility and missing hardware drivers.

"The reality is that Microsoft could not have shipped Vista in November if real people were going to be using it en masse for real things right away," Silver asserted. "With consumers not getting Windows Vista until 30 January 2007, and most businesses just 'kicking its tires' (if that) over the holidays, Microsoft and the Windows ecosystem have an 11-week extension between RTM and actual use."

The real situation, despite any Microsoft prognostications to the contrary, is that Windows Vista released in 2006 in name only. What's that adage about a tree falling in the forest and there being no one to hear?

Silver argues that Microsoft could not have pulled off this sleight of hand without Microsoft Update. "Microsoft is including more than 19,000 [drivers] 'in the box,' but expects to have another 12,000 available via Microsoft Update," he explains. "Some of the drivers available so far are still considered beta, are somewhat unstable or do not support the full feature set of the devices."

As a user, I find Windows Vista to be a fairly stable product, but it feels unfinished because some stuff simply doesn't work or work well with it. For example, over the weekend I purchased a copy of CuteFTP 8 for use with my personal blog. The software properly installed and initially took the registration number, but later failed. The registration process required administrator privileges, which meant using the "Run as Administrator" option to start the program. CuteFTP seems to function fine, but crashes on every exit.

Something else: I'm raw about RAW support. Microsoft made big noise in the summer of 2005 about how Windows Vista would have native file-level RAW support from major camera manufacturers. I've transferred Canon and Nikon RAW files to my Windows Vista PC, but they aren't viewable within Windows Photo Gallery; the RAW filters aren't available yet.

Then there are the strange nuances that are sure to pain some businesses. According to a December Microsoft Knowledge Base article, Windows Vista computers "manufactured by IBM or by Lenovo may take 10 to 20 seconds longer to start than a similar Windows Vista-based computer that is from another manufacturer." Huh? Apparently, Windows Vista's disk optimization feature is not hot-swappable drive compatible.

There is a hotfix for IBM or Lenovo computers that don't use swappable drives. But, c'mon, it's not like the swappable drive is a new invention that Windows Vista couldn't fully support. I wonder if that fix will be available from Microsoft Update.

Yes, much as I like Vista, it feels very much like a work in progress. The list of potential gotchas gets longer every time I look. Microsoft Update is one mechanism for getting stuff compatible with Windows Vista. But how long and at what cost to Microsoft and its partners? If there's a silver lining it may be the good business for the channel, because somebody is going to have advise on this stuff or fix it.

The bigger concern is one of first impressions, which do matter. Buyers shopping for Windows Vista won't be so different from people perusing big-screen TVs at the local Best Buy. Shoppers for that second or third TV are going to be pretty finicky. So will be IT organizations or consumers evaluating a Vista PC against the perfectly adequate Windows XP computer they've already got.

There's still time to fix the problem. But every day that post-holiday IT organizations kick the Vista tires or that Vista's consumer launch draws nearer, opportunity-to-fix erodes.

Silver challenges: "Coupled with the security issues that have already surfaced, Microsoft and the ecosystem need to provide complete and stable driver support by launch, or Windows Vista will have a difficult time overcoming some troublesome first impressions."

Thanks to colleague Ryan Naraine for his contribution to this post.

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/10008

Comments (10)

Roger :

The post is kind of hard to read. It's like every tenth word is missing.

Joe :

I would prefer some app incompatibility and a more secure OS, rather than a series of small security holes so that these programs work.

A lot of manufacturers have been waiting for GA. Their priority will always be selling new hardware - therefore making sure new products have good quality drivers.

Sean :

I've been running Vista for a month on my main machine, works at least as good as XP or Win2k Pro. Every Microsoft OS that I’ve ever used continued to receive bug fixes and new features for at least a couple years after RTM. Even non-MS operating systems such as Ubuntu (I recently installed 6.10 - I had to download almost eighty update's the first day) are in constant development... I would say this is a good thing otherwise we'd never get new software.

Doug :

Im running RC2 on an HP dv2000t. Other than docking it has been very stable. Bounce between external/local video+audio and there are a lot of problems.

My other major beef with it is the lack of printer drivers, especially multi-function printers such as those offered by Dell. We are all in a holding pattern it seems.

Chris :

Maybe Ford could start doing the same..... "Hello sir, heres your new car, however the engine and the wheels wont be ready for another year yet."


With reference to rogers comment, dosent that sound right for somthing realated to microsoft? Every tenth word missing? In fact, that could be the new slogan for microsoft : "MICROSOFT - EVERY TENTH BYTE MISSING"

MacShill :

Joe, Try a macbook. Or even install UBUNTU on an old PC you've got laying around.

The real story with VISTA is the opportunity they have given Apple to steal their base.

Xepol :

Vista is a train wreck, anyone who claims otherwise is lying or a ms employee towing the company line.

Avoid Vista and you'll definitely feel better about your computing experience for at least a year.

Ask ANYONE who's already tried it...

glenn :

Hey Xepol

You A hole, yea please ask ANYBODY! just read the ones who like it above you!

I hate microsoft haters!

Joe :

MacShill wrote: "Joe, Try a macbook. Or even install UBUNTU on an old PC you've got laying around."

MacShill,

I recently sold my MacBook Pro, while it still had value. I need to run Vista for a few months full time. I may get a replacement later in the year. I still have a MacBook in the household.

Ubuntu, I've got that, too, for PowerPC Macs and 32-bit Intel.

Anything else you would like me to try?

Joe

Nick :

To Doug:
You said that you are running Vista on HP DV2000T..how is your battery life compared when you were with WinXP?

Post a Comment

 
 
RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise