How eWEEK Spent My Summer Vacation
|
News Commentary. My vacation is over, but my colleagues stayed hot on top of Microsoft news. Here's some of the good stuff I missed (hopefully, not you, too), and my brief commentary about it. |
Google Blasted for Gmail, Google Apps Outages, Clint Boulton
Whoa, Gmail went down while I was on vacation? OMG! Thank you, Google! I wondered why there was less junk coming into my Gmail account last week. What a relief to get less mail on my iPhone while vacationing.
Microsoft executives can snicker about the fallibility of cloud services and harp on the importance of desktop software. Microsoft managers also can boast about data center investments and the reliability of their services. But reliability means Microsofties got e-mail on their vacations. I hope they enjoyed the extra 30 hours of work during the week off. Google gave some of us Gmail users a break. To whom should I send the thank-you card?
Microsoft Prepares Patch Tuesday Program for Security Vendors, Brian Prince
I file this one in the better-late-than-never department. In October, Microsoft will launch the Active Protections Program, which will provide "select" security vendors with advance patch informationand presumably patch accessahead of the updates' release, which regularly is the second Tuesday of every month. What a great idea, but why didn't Microsoft do this sooner?
Here's the problem: Malware writers use the patches as blueprints for reverse-engineering exploits. It's good to see Microsoft's billions of dollars in research benefiting somebodyeh, right? Malware typically appears within hours of a patch's release. Informed security vendors could issue updates to their customers ahead of time. At the least, security software heuristics could scan for a certain kind of behavior.
There is always going to be a lag between patches' release and their installation, either manually, by Windows Update or by Windows Server Update Services. That between time is when Windows PCs would be most vulnerable to exploitation.
I have to ask, couldn't Microsoft come up with a better name for the program? "Active Protections" could easily be a condom distribution program.
Microsoft Patch Tuesday Targets 26 Application Flaws, Brian Prince
Twenty-six? Crap, I spat out coffee on my keyboard again. Really, 26? Need there be another reason for Microsoft to launch that new security disclosure program in October? September would be even better, methinks.
Has anyone else noticed just how consistently Microsoft releases application security patches, pretty much every month? Last time I checked, the majority of zero-day exploits targeted applications. Gasp, could it be that Microsoft really has hardened Windows security? Better security one place means the hackers go somewhere else. As enterprises fortified the network perimeter, attacks shifted more to the operating system. As Windows security improves, attacks increase against applications.
Application-layer attacks aren't new; they've been on the rise as more applications connect to the Internet or hacks use the Web browser as a big, unsecured truck loading bay for driving past perimeter security. Funny, Microsoft is quick to count security vulnerabilities as a measure of improved Windows or Windows Server security. But who at Microsoft keeps count of Excel, Word or PowerPoint exploits?
Developers Herald VS 2008, .NET SP1, Darryl Taft
Herald? What, did the angels descend from Heaven to proclaim the service pack's release to manufacturing? All bow down to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, who throws chairs at the wicked and yells "Developers! Developers! Developers!" to the faithful.
Yes, Google Is a Media Company, Clint Boulton
I don't know about that. I agree with Clint that Google is a platform company. But I view Google as more of a media aggregator because it generates no real content, but leeches off the good work of others. Google makes money through search, search keywords and advertising off of everybody else's content.
Google is a parasite. Yes, its business model is symbiotic-parasitical. Content providers benefit from search, which provides easy access to their stuff. Google profits from the access and the keywords it sells around the content. But Google creates none of the content. Google doesn't own the information from which it makes nearly all its revenue. Google is the middleman of the information, which it takes for freeand usually without asking. At least Microsoft produces software and makes money off the licensing. Microsoft owns what it sells, but not Google.
Linux to Outsell Windows in Mobile Internet Device Market, Eric Brown
How could I possibly disagree? Microsoft hasn't got much to offer MID manufacturers. There's Windows Vista, which won't run on the devices. Whoops. That leaves Windows XP Home or Windows Mobile 6.1, neither of which is an attractive option. Ssssh, Windows Mobile has run aground. But that's a topic for another blog. Intel and Nokia are pushing Linux on MIDs, which is perhaps endorsement enough. As for Windows? Linux vendors would like to wash it away.
Microsoft Site CodePlex Turns 2, Darryl Taft
Bwhahaha, so begins CodePlex's "terrible twos." Those open-source developers could get mighty cranky as they mature in their .NET development.
What to See at Microsoft PDC, Darryl Taft
Active Protections isn't the only thing coming in October. The Professional Developers Conference opens Oct. 27 in Los Angeles. Yes, I will be there, and Darryl, too. Some of the sessions are better named than most Microsoft products. Session "A Lap Around 'Oslo'" is simply classic.
I suppose that this year's PDC will be Windows 7's coming out party. It would be absolutely criminal for Microsoft to hold PDC and not to invite its flagship operating system. Seven will dazzle with multitouch capabilities, Vista's core features and so onor to use a Steve Ballmer euphemism, "Blah, blah, blah."
[Please send your tips or rumors to watchtips at live.com]


Comments (4)
Re: Google is a parasite...
@Joe,
I think these claims are splitting hairs. After all, Map makers don't actually make or own the roads, rivers, mountains, trails, buildings, parks, and so on that it puts on their maps. They only sell 2-dimensional views of those things and often sell advertising to them also. In essence, they provide a paper version of Google Maps, and as such, provide a valuable service, and not a product (other than the paper they are printed on). Services are no less or more valuable than products just because they are services.
I don't claim to know what goes on in Google's head (or boardroom or lab), but... When I run Linux, the likes of Microsoft and SCOG claim that I am violating their patents or copyrights when there is no evidence what-so-blinkin-ever that I am. But when I go to 411 or Yahoo or Cuil (which is MUCH improved since it first launched), Google doesn't threaten me. They just work to make their "mousetrap" better. And their advertisers seem to acknowledge the superiority of the Google mousetrap.
Microsoft doesn't own the Internet, most of its networking software having been developed at the expense of US taxpayers and not Microsoft, yet it's ONLY from lack of trying that they don't exact a huge toll from everyone using the Internet. They don't own everything they sell, either.
In summary, if you want to lump Microsoft and Google together into that group of powerful corporations that should be carefully watched and constantly evaluated, then I agree. But this "Google is evil and Microsoft is the Second Coming" message is just so much nonsense.
Posted by Philosopher | August 13, 2008 4:41 PM
Oh, and, Welcome back! (my manners are not up to par; I apologize...)
Posted by Philosopher | August 13, 2008 4:44 PM
This RSS feed is in runaway mode. Every couple of hours, I get the same postings, over and over. Please fix this. I really do not want to unsubscribe this feed. Thanks! - Erik
Posted by Erik | August 14, 2008 8:39 AM
Every Corporation wants to make Money. Google is no Messiah. Same with Microsoft. Tomorrow if Apple springs up in Market, it will do what exactly MS and Google are doing today. In the end its the people who end up taking the hit.I have seen people argue on Apple VS Microsoft, Microsoft VS Google etc. Its useless.
If Steve Jobs sees any threat to his IPOD, i bet he will also resort to un ethical practices to keep Apple Monopoly. So in the end there is no difference if you are Bill Gates, Steve Jobs or Larry page.
My 3 cents.
Posted by John | August 14, 2008 9:33 AM