eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
July 16, 2007 5:41 PM

Microsoft Clubs Its Way to Search Gains



Ho. Ho. Ho. It's Christmas in July. Today, ComScore released June search share data, which shows Microsoft has made gains against Google and Yahoo. Now, why is that?

In the grand scheme of search, the percentage changes might seem small. What's more significant is the trend.

Microsoft was the only search provider to gain market share from May to June. Three of the top five search vendors—Google, Time Warner and Yahoo—together lost 2.9 percent of the market share. Apparently Microsoft snatched shares from them, gaining 2.9 percent month after month.

ComScore largely attributed Microsoft's gains to its Live Search Club, which is a few months old. Users play games using Windows Live search and some win prizes. The gaming generates Live Search queries. In a sense, Microsoft is paying these gamers to use Live Search, a strategy that may be paying off for Microsoft.

June 07 Search Share

While Google and Yahoo lost search share in June, they both saw month-over-month increases in search volume, according to ComScore. Google rose from 3.9 billion to 4 billion performed search queries; Yahoo rose slightly off its base of 2 billion queries; Microsoft search queries jumped to 1.1 billion from 782 million; Ask search queries rose to 403 million from 384 million queries; Time Warner declined, from 384 million to 341 million search queries. Overall, Americans conducted 8 billion search queries in June.

Live Search Club helped boost Microsoft's search volume by 36 percent, according to ComScore. Some other search trackers see higher gains. Compete put Microsoft search query volume up by 67 percent from May, or 48 percent year over year. Like ComScore, Compete attributed most of Microsoft search gains to Live Search Club, which chocked up 3 million unique users in June.

The pay-for-search scheme isn't necessarily sustainable. It's one thing for Microsoft to woo people to play Live Search games, while it's something else to convert them to consistent users. Nevertheless, Microsoft has demonstrated how volatile the search market can be, including the ease with which queries can shift elsewhere.

The weakness in Google's business model is the business model itself. Search isn't sticky enough. People can change search providers by typing in a new Web address. Software is very customer sticky, because of the natural barriers to switching.

There is no indication yet of massive search defections because of Live Search Club and there may never be. But the shift in flow of the search market share demonstrates what could happen and why Google is so headstrong about creating sticky applications.

[Editor's Note: Table Updated.]

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/11316

Comments (7)

chips b malroy :

Just a guess Joe, but since Vista comes with Internet Exployer set to MS default online search engine, Windows live/MSN or whatever its called this week. Perhaps the 4.5% of the market that Vista is now is part of the reason?

I know Google did pay Dell to change the default on their machines with Vista, but the others should all be MS MSN by default. Thats my guess.

Greg :

Chips is spot on. Some of the stickiness comes from the default search in the browser. IE defaults to Windows Live, while Firefox and Safari default to Google. Plus, many people install toolbars that guide traffic towards the major websites.

Microsoft is still a niche player. But adoption of Vista may increase their reach. How long until another antitrust lawsuit?

Jake :

This is defiantly good news for Microsoft. Microsoft has been putting a large amount of effort and resources into improving their position in the search engine market and they have to be happy to see it starting to pay off. It will be interesting to see if the trend continues through when the next report is released. What may even be more interesting is how Google will react to this. Google has been buying up everything they can only to lose ground, it will be interesting to see if they react or if they pass it off as a fluke and make no changes to their business.

Dane :

Software is the wrong paradigm for looking at search services. The best analog is broadcast. Totally volatile and results driven. Microsoft provided better "programming" with their contests, but time will tell if there was any residual affect. It was just sweeps week.

Bruce :

Google pays Firefox to use its search, and in return Google pumps up the Firefox stats by doing a prefetch of dozens of sites and pretending to be an actual Firefox user clicking on a site.

Seems dishonest to me.

Gerard :

Something is wrong with this table. The 4.6% and 4.2% for Time Warner are probably mixed up if they have a 0.4% loss.

It may also a good idea to mention exactly for which market these shares are, presumably for the US market?

Joe :

Gerard wrote: "Something is wrong with this table."

Thanks, Gerard,

You're right. Table is corrected.

Joe

Post a Comment

 
 


RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise