eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
December 10, 2009 5:13 PM

Microsoft's New Problem: The French Military



Yes, the above title was not some sort of catastrophic typing error on my part. In addition to having to deal with the likes of Google and Apple, now Microsoft finds itself taking flak from another front: the French military.

(There are so many jokes I could make at this juncture, but I'm refraining. For at least another couple of paragraphs.)

Specifically, the French Ministry of Defense made the executive decision to switch to Mozilla Thunderbird, an open-source e-mail platform, from Microsoft Outlook. According to a Reuters article on the topic, Mozilla's open-source design allowed the army to create security extensions, something it allegedly couldn't do with Microsoft's system.

Thunderbird, along with a modified variant called Trustedbird, currently runs on about 80,000 French military computers, according to the article. Other French ministries are also apparently adopting open-source software for some of their own systems.

When queried by moi, a Microsoft spokesperson offered a curt, "We are not commenting on this topic."

The newest version of Mozilla's e-mail platform, Thunderbird 3, includes features such as filtered search and tabbed e-mail. Rated as compatible with Windows, Mac OS X and open-source platforms, Thunderbird 3 is built on the Gecko 1.9.1 rendering platform, which gives it the same security enhancements and Web Standards support as the Firefox browser.

Microsoft recently lost one of its key open-source advocates when Sam Ramji, the company's senior director of Platform Strategy, officially left to become interim president of the CodePlex Foundation on Sept. 25 (although considering that CodePlex is Microsoft's open-source software project hosting repository, I'm sort of confused as to how Ramji "left Microsoft"). In a blog post at the time written by Bill Hilf, general manager of Windows Server Marketing and Platform Strategy, Ramji had pushed a vision of Microsoft coexisting peacefully "in a heterogeneous IT world."

Hilf also suggested that an open-source software strategy was being increasingly embraced within many of Redmond's divisions.

There have been a few recent areas of contention between Microsoft and the open-source community, however. On Dec. 9, Microsoft posted a revamped version of its free Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool (WUDT), a couple of weeks after being forced to yank the program over allegations that it improperly copied open-source code. Microsoft claims that a third-party contractor assigned to the project had integrated the code, which came from a CodePlex-hosted GLPv2-licensed ImageMaster project, without properly acknowledging the source.

In a Dec. 9 statement posted on Port25 (which bills itself as a communication portal for the open-source community within Microsoft), Peter Galli--open-source community manager for Microsoft's Platform Strategy Group--did not directly acknowledge the code-lifting, but said the WUDT had now been released under GNU GPLv2 (General Public License Version 2).

There'll be arguments on both sides as to whether Microsoft has indeed become friendlier to the open-source community. But one thing's for sure: The French government evidently wanted an e-mail system modified beyond what Microsoft will allow--and if France did it, then other governments or large corporations could conceivably follow in its footsteps. The city of Los Angeles already chose Google over Microsoft for its 30,000 municipal employees' e-mail.

My point is, Microsoft faces a potential danger here in maintaining its traditionally large market share within large enterprises and governments--particularly if those enterprises and governments start demanding specially modified capabilities. But I'm betting the executives in Redmond are already devoting a great deal of thought to that very issue--along with how big of a private army they'll need to raise in order to invade France.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/18700

Comments (6)

jedR :

The CodePlex site (codeplex.com) is a distinct entity to the CodePlex Foundation (codeplex.org), despite it's 'branding'. In turn, the CodePlex Foundation is a distinct entity to Microsoft. Microsoft is currently listed as the single sponsor of the foundation. Three of the six directors, and six of its fourteen members of the advisory board are currently employed by Microsoft. Sam Ramji, who is chairman of the board of directors, is no longer employed by Microsoft, and is currently a VP at Sonoa.

On a different point, I was involved, over a decade ago, in some early encounters between the military in another major European country and a 'consortium' of three large commercial software companies including Microsoft. They were looking at the feasibility of extending COTS mail agents to support PKI (none of them did at the time). The military were interested in the possibility of using COTS software to meet their needs. I particularly remember the rather unconvincing slide set showing a soldier under fire in a front-line bunker sending secure emails back to HQ via a wireless link (no doubt using Outlook!).

At the time, some of us thought the idea that COTS software would be suitable for such military use was more than a little naive. Indeed, forget about bunkers. Even in more mundane settings, military organizations have very different security requirements than those generally encountered in the commercial world. There is the small matter of labeling (security classification), for example. Or again, access rights can be tied to specific hardware and networks. That is not something I encounter in the commercial world.

Building on an open-source codebase to meet the very exacting requirements of a military organization makes a lot of sense.

Actually most governments in EU member states use open source software platforms, which they say provides them with better security and more control mechanisms.

French military using this open source software platform may persuade others too to use this software which may bring a tough time for microsoft in the future.

aaaa :

French Military drop IBM LOTUS too not only Outlook. Los Angeles drop Novel e-mail system not Microsoft.

jedR :

My point was that a military organization is probably making a very sensible and straight-forward decision to adopt an open-source platform rather than a COTS platform. As aaaa implies, given their very specific requirements this is likely to be a general rejection of COTS software rather than a rejection of Microsoft Outlook per se. I don't quite understand why this story implies some major problem for Outlook's future, especially given its place in the Office suite. Commercial companies and public sector organizations will, I suspect, continue to make IT investment decisions much as they have done in the past and won't be particularly swayed by a story about a particular army. In my experience, military organizations have been 'demanding' (or at least asking for) specially modified capabilities in software for a very long time.

freedomfries :

"There are so many jokes I could make at this juncture, but I'm refraining. For at least another couple of paragraphs" : perhaps we can share our jokes... I have so many jokes about americans... but i'm refraining...

Post a Comment

 
 
RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise