MTV Gets Real, Microsoft Gets Punk'd
|
Microsoft is a great partner, until it decides to compete. Then everything goes to hell. |
Yesterday's MTV- RealNetworks alignment is a cautionary tale about how Microsoft botched a lucrative music partnership. It's a classic example of Microsoft changing strategy midstream because of a real or perceived competitor, when the company should have kept the priority on its partners.
MTV: A Powerful Partner
Some background: In late 2005, Microsoft and MTV announced URGE, a new music store that would be integrated into Windows Media Player 11.
The MTV partnership made sense for loads of reasons:
- MTV already was a showcase customer for Windows Media technologies and close partner because of MTV Overdrive. The broadband music channel widely used Windows Media technologies, including DRM (digital rights management), and appeared in Windows Media Center's Online Spotlight section.
- MTV has a strong and recognizable brand that is synonymous with music and youth. MTV brand association is what Microsoft needed to gain traction against iTunes and the iPod and the proliferation of Apple's Fairplay-DRM format.
- MTV is a programming powerhouse while MSN Music was a lame duck from its launch. There was no feel of a program director in charge, the way there was at iTunes Music Store. MTV knows how to program contentand not just music. Microsoft badly needed this kind of content focus integrated into the Windows experience.
- MTV could have given Microsoft access to loads of contenteverything from Comedy Central to Nickelodeon to VH1. With MTV, Microsoft could have established an online video presence long before Apple added movies to the iTunes Music Store; the content would have been better aligned with younger consumers buying music and devices.
- Microsoft could have cut online advertising deals across MTV properties . An MTV/Viacom partner could have been a showcase customer for MSN adCenter.
I contend that the Microsoft-MTV partnership was rife with possibilities and could have put some drag on the iPod's and iTunes' momentum. People seem to forget that the iPod wasn't an instant hit and that the iTunes Store came several years after the device. I see two fundamental reasons for the iPod's success:
- Apple got the user interface/synchronization mechanism right with version one.
- Potential customers already owned plenty of content they could use on an iPod. Rip, synch and roll, baby.
Content remains king (or queen, if you like), and MTV has a whole lot more programmable content, programming experience and established record label relationships than Apple. Microsoft could have inherited those from its music partner and made all that content available in Windows Media Audio format.
URGE is Purged
But Microsoft derailed the MTV partnership even before URGE launched. In July 2006, following months of rumors, Microsoft revealed that it would launch Zune music player and its own music storethe Zune Marketplace. Windows Media Player 11 officially launched months later, in October, with the wonderfully integrated URGE music store. URGE delivered an outstanding user experienceand with the subscription serviceone equal to and in some ways superior to the iTunes Music Store. A few weeks after WMP 11 was released, Microsoft launched its new music player and Zune Marketplace, which bore strong resemblance to URGE but without nearly as good playlists or programming.
In last November's post, "Microsoft's Music Madness," I questioned the sanity of abandoning partners rather than working with them to fix the Windows Media music problem.
Fast forward to yesterday. RealNetworks and MTV have formed the new company Rhapsody America. Verizon and Vodafone are partners, too, creating a surprisingly strong axis reaching the mobile, Web and desktop markets. Nearly all those benefits listed above for Microsoft now go to Real. The major exception is the advertising portion, in the sense that Real isn't in the business of ad serving and keyword search, as are Google and Microsoft.
Not only did Microsoft lose an important partner in MTV, a former rival is now emboldened. Before the iPod and iTunes tore up the music market, Microsoft worried more about RealNetworks, the star of which dimmed somewhat because of Apple. But Real's relationship with SanDisk helped keep the star in the sky. Now that star is brightly shining, and its shadow may even fall on Apple.
The Universal Tax
What six months ago looked like a music showdown between Microsoft and Apple is now looking more like MTV/Real will be the more formidable opponent, with Zune and the Zune Marketplace headed to the sidelines.
Microsoft bet wrong on a solo, integrated music strategy that is inconsistent with its partner roots and that alienated hundreds of partners, MTV being only one. Worse, DRM-free music from EMI and Universal Music Group make uncertain the long-term Apple and Microsoft proprietary, rights-protected formats.
For now, Apple and Microsoft both stand on the sidelines as Universal pushes out huge catalogs of DRM-free music to many different online retailers. As I said before, content is king.
There's an irony and perhaps an answer in Universal's moves. The irony is that Microsoft agreed to a Universal tax of a buck for each Zune sold, yet the software giant isn't yet reaping the DRM-free sales benefits. The answer may be why Universal refused to renew its long-term contract with Apple. Universal understands the value of content. By locking out Apple, Universal can generate more competition and that would be good for its business.
But that's the easy answer. I believe there is another: Apple doesn't want to pay a similar Universal tax on the iPod. Universal's DRM-free distribution plan puts lots of pressure on Apple to make concessions to the music label. I suspect that one of those is giving a cut of iPod sales to Universal.
As for Microsoft, there is a second irony. The company's PlaysForSure marketing was all about choice. Zune took away choice from partners and many customers. Now, DRM-free music is helping to create more choice, as did Microsoft's decision to go solo. If not for Zune, Microsoft and MTV could have made sweet music. Instead, there is Rhapsody, and more alternatives to the iPod and iTunes.
Related Posts:
- On the Road With Microsoft, Microsoft Watch, August 13, 2007
- Is That 1 Million Zunes Shipped or Sold?, Microsoft Watch, May 29, 2007
- What Apple DRM-Free Means to Microsoft, Microsoft Watch, April 2, 2007
- Whoa, Zune Is Social, Microsoft Watch, January 2, 2007
- Welcome to My Social, Microsoft Watch, December 25, 2007
- Zune Goes to War, Microsoft Watch, November 14, 2006


Comments (11)
That's not even news. Urge wasn't doing well so MTV decided to switch. Big deal. You're overstating Microsoft's losses here. Now that it's over you contend that the partnership was rife with possibilities. If Microsoft owns the code etc. for the service, it's actually good news because this way they can port it over to the Zune Marketplace and improve it. It's also good for Microsoft because they can focus entirely on the Zune now (in spite of all the ridicule from the iPeople and the linux guys, it's actually doing reasonably well).
Posted by reflections | August 22, 2007 8:35 PM
reflections wrote: "Big deal. You're overstating Microsoft's losses here. Now that it's over you contend that the partnership was rife with possibilities."
Actually, I identified most of these same possibilities in December 2005. If you Google "The URGE to Listen?," a cache version of the blog post is available.
URGE wasn't doing well because Microsoft abandoned MTV--and all the other PlaysForeSure partners.
Joe
Posted by Joe | August 22, 2007 8:53 PM
"URGE wasn't doing well because Microsoft abandoned MTV--and all the other PlaysForeSure partners."
Hardly abandoned Joe since they continued to support Playsforsure. Also, it might be worth pointing out the obvious - the partners in this case got their asses kicked by Apple. MSFT looking to try something new after years of going down with the partner ship in this segment seems like common sense. Had the execution on Zune not been so poor, it might even have worked.
Posted by Paul | August 22, 2007 10:38 PM
Regardless of who MTV's partner is (and what that said partner did to the relationship), URGE is still dead in the water because MTV, as a content provider, a.) doesn't understand the digital marketplace and b.) it doesn't work with the iPod. They don't even have a killer device to make the experience even comparable. That's the end of the story.
Posted by David | August 22, 2007 10:52 PM
Seems to me that Microsoft is right on target with their player and Zune Marketplace. It's a perfect emulation of their XBox "success" story. Like XB360, they are losing $30 per player sold, and Zune Marketplace has to throw BMG a buck every time one sells -- a two-fer!
Loss upon loss - yes that Robbie Bach is a real business wiz kid. Uncle Fester must be so proud.
Posted by jerry j | August 22, 2007 11:30 PM
It will be interesting to see how Universal's decision plays out. It's called a test which I certainly agree it is.
The thing is I'm not sure Universal understands the mp3 player marketplace yet. It's all ipod for the most part. This means what are they going to do to help their customers with getting their music on an ipod. One of the killer features that gets overlooked by most of the geek boys is that the itunes software makes the experience so seemless.
What's worse is that if they decide to have exclusive content via their site and not offer it to itunes, that could defeat what they're trying to accomplish by driving users back to pirating. From my point of view I see users stuck more on the hardware than any service first and foremost. The more seamless a service is the better chance it has to draw people in rather than pirate.
Many of the couch potato geek boys might disagree until their mom walks in on them in the basement bedroom but it's a rather simple thing to understand.
A little more on topic though this isn't the first time MS has seemingly screwed their partners. There's been articles written for years about how many companies that partner with MS seem to be on top of the world and later after the damage is done regret what they did. As far as that is concerned this article isn't news but for a lot of youngsters they just see MS as god with their games on the PC and the xbox. MS certainly ain't all that.
Posted by Jim | August 23, 2007 10:25 AM
Personally I don't think apple care if Universal make unprotected content in the mp3 format. The iPod plays Mp3s. IIRC iTunes only makes enough money to break even.
iTunes was originally devised as a lure to get people to buy Apple hardware. That is where Apple makes its money on the iPod. The directors of the music labels are so far out of touch with the average 17 year its actually comical to watch them trip up over themselves.
Way back in 1999 all the labels promised a sure fire DRM media format to combat the rise of unprotected mp3s. They poured money into a black hole and refused to provide an online store of their catalogues and instead hired a bunch of lawyers to sue people instead.
Here we are 8 years later and only now they are beginning to understand. I imagine the money they have spent on lawyers, idiotic DRM mechanics and the lost revenue by not actually providing a decent LEGAL method of purchasing digital music over the net dwarfs the amount of "POTENTIAL" lost sales due to piracy.
Posted by william | August 23, 2007 6:13 PM
As for Microsoft, it thinks it is so big it can afford to burn its bridges. Sooner or later it will find itself an island.
Posted by William | August 23, 2007 6:15 PM
Something else about DRM
"Google and Universal Music Group will be partnering with gBox, Inc., an online music retailer, to sell DRM-free music tracks via Google search results"
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_universal_music_gbox_itunes.php
Posted by Marco | August 23, 2007 6:57 PM
Microsoft hasn't been able to maintain a consistent user experience across recent versions of Windows Media Player. If you've stayed with v9 or v10 because you either don't want to put up with the abject bugginess in v11, or because your Windows version doesn't support it, then you'll find that you're left with pitifully laid out ads for CDs whenever looking up information on your current album. If you're outside the US then the bar for online store quality is so low that a snake could slither over it. There's no global version of Urge that competes with Apple.
In respect of Microsoft burning bridges with partners: it does the same thing between its own departments internally. Most of the time it is even conscious: it's the move-on and forget-the-past mentality that is espoused for managerially-mobile employees. So when someone moves to a new job, there is no one left to pick up management of external relationships and all sorts of dependencies fall flat. In the case of external partners, they're just left wounded by no one returning their calls. With no corporate memory to remember individual errors, or the pattern of problems caused by this, Microsoft stumbles on like a blind lunatic...
Posted by Mike | August 26, 2007 5:08 AM
It seems everytime Microsoft gets a good idea and starts down the right track, they screw up and end up worse off. Microsoft could have been a player in the online music stores, but now they have nothing.
Posted by Kevin | October 24, 2007 1:15 AM