eWeek Microsoft Watch
Advertisement
Advertisement
July 19, 2007 9:11 AM

Office 2007: Don't Wait for Vista



January's simultaneous operating system and productivity suite releases should have been cause for simultaneous customer upgrades. But there are plenty of reasons for enterprises to deploy separately—and Office 2007 much sooner than Vista.

Conceptually, Office and Windows are conjoined products. Many businesses wouldn't have one without the other. Not since 1995 versions simultaneously shipped has Microsoft given enterprises so much reason to consider both together.

Rather than sizzling, however, sales synergy is drizzling. Analysts' early estimates indicate brisker business uptake of Office 2007, with many enterprises planning to wait until perhaps next year to seriously begin Vista deployments.

"Although Microsoft made a big deal about Vista and Office shipping together, there's really very little synergy between the products," said Paul DeGroot, lead desktop strategies analyst for Directions on Microsoft. "Vista was still shape-shifting toward the end of the Office dev cycle, so the Office team couldn't do much integration with it."

Office 2007 Deploy or Not

Factors undermining sales synergy between the products:

  • Hefty system requirements mean that most businesses must either upgrade or replace PCs before deploying Vista. IT organizations can deploy Office 2007 on existing hardware.
  • Office launched as a finished product, while Vista is continuously updated—at the least, for hardware and software compatibility—via Windows Update. Many businesses are holding off Vista upgrades until release of Service Pack 1.
  • Microsoft used different task-based user interface motifs for both products. There aren't huge benefits from using Office 2007 and Vista together.
  • Unlike 1995, when many businesses were still deploying first-time PCs, operating system and productivity suite decisions are often made separately. Most IT managers I have spoken to say that they make operating system decisions based on applications; a decade ago, oftentimes the operating system predicated application decision.

Microsoft makes up for some of the missing Office 2007-Vista synergy by way of the productivity suite's strong server software connections, such as Exchange Server 2007, SharePoint Server 2007, SQL Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008. Server dependencies mean increased upfront acquisition costs for some businesses, however particularly those without upgrade protection via Enterprise Agreement or Software Assurance.

Office 2007 Wait or Not

For example, basic collaboration and document management functions and advanced search capabilities require SharePoint Server 2007. Business intelligence capabilities require multiple server-side software, including SharePoint 2007, SQL Server 2008 and Windows 2008. The latter two products are scheduled for availability sometime next year. Each new server product adds base software cost plus CALs (client-access licenses).

While many enterprises shouldn't hold off Office 2007 deployments for Vista, server-side dependencies would be a reason to wait. Collaboration, communications and document management capabilities would be good reasons to deploy 2007 versions of Exchange Server, Office and SharePoint. However, Windows Server 2008 may be worth delaying deployments. Microsoft's 2007-2008 release cycle pushes an integrated vertical server-to-desktop stack. Windows Server 2008 is the foundation for building other pieces of the vertical stack, including new Exchange and SharePoint versions.

Businesses looking for basic productivity gains will find plenty out of the box, because of Office 2007's revamped user interface. If the UI changes meet basic employee productivity needs, there is no need to wait for Vista (where there is little additional benefit) or newer server software (where there may be benefits the organization doesn't need).

As for the future, stronger Office and Windows synergy may be coming.

"Far more promising would be the next versions of each product, which will probably be a more stable version of Vista and a version of Office that really leverages the OS," DeGroot said. But he doesn't expect to see such synergy until 2010 or later.

Related Posts:

TrackBack

TrackBack

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/cgi-bin/mte/mt-tb.cgi/11345

Comments (6)

just a drone :

The statement: "Businesses looking for basic productivity gains will find plenty out of the box, because of Office 2007's revamped user interface." This is pure marketing hype. The reverse will be the case.

Around here people had trouble dealing with the small user interface changes that occurred when changing form Office XP to Office 2003. A change to Office 2007 is going to require retraining and slower productivity while folks relearn how to do tasks.

In fact, in the writing community I work in, I have heard absolutely no buzz for Office 2007 at all. It's the application no one is asking for, which is different from the past. Normally you have that group of people who want the status of running the newest application on their PC or lap top. In the case 0f Office 2007, no one wants that honor.

Paul :

"There aren't huge benefits from using Office 2007 and Vista together."

Except of course the reliability and productivity benefits of Vista. But hey, those are nothing right?

Richard :

@just a drone:

I certainly don't. I was an Office user for nearly 10 years. But once I moved to Vista, I gave up on Office and I'm now using OpenOffice.org. I haven't looked back since.

For the vast majority of Windows users, OpenOffice.org is more than good enough.

@Paul:
Reliability and productivity benefits of Vista???

In the four months that I've been using Vista, I have not noticed such. Frankly, I don't spend that much time at the desktop fiddling with Vista. I could have stuck with Windows XP and lose very few benefits.

Jeff :

I think Microsoft has created a huge learning curve with the new office software, and that's going to seriously hurt. I've been using Office 2007 now for a few months, and as a software developer and now full-time editor/writer, even I still have trouble with the new interface. I'm constantly struggling to figure out how to do things in it that were second nature before. (How do you count how many characters are in a document? Took me forever to figure out how many words there are -- it's at the bottom in the status bar.)

However, the reason I like the new software is even though the .docx format is big and bulky compared to open office, the format is much easier for third-party software to parse and manipulate than the previous binary .doc formats were, which is important to me for my document managing and handling.

Randy O. :

Many people felt the same way bout the user interface so our company has come up with an Office 2007 (Word, Excel and Powerpoint) add-in that brings back Office 2003's classic menus and toolbars. Now you can use the menus, toolbars and (if you want) the Ribbon!

You can download the demo at http://www.toolbartoggle.com

ToolbarToggle brings back that familiar, customizable, Office 2003 interface into Office 2007 so people could still migrate to Office 2007 which is a great product.

Please check out our product ToolbarToggle which enables anyone to have a full working replica of the old menus, and commandbars with full customization features (macros, autotext, new toolbars) as well as floating and docking capabilities too!

Would love to get your feedback!
sales@toolbartoggle.com

Robert :

Wait until SP1 - Office 2007 has lots of little bugs. There's a really dumb bug in Outlook 2007 plain text messages - it goes through the motions of spell checking the message but when the message is sent - no corrects are made - the message with spelling errors goes through. How does something like this get through testing?

Post a Comment

 
 
RSS Syndication

Advertisement
Advertisement
Microsoft Watch     Contact Us | Advertise | Site Map
Ziff Davis Enterprise