Foundation Server Is Foundation for What?
|
News Analysis. I sometimes wonder if anyone keeps track of how many PR people Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer drives into cardiac arrest. |
He'll shoot his mouth off about this new product or that forthcoming widget, long before there's any official announcement. He was chock-full of heart-stopping pre-announcements today.
The big one is big because of what it could represent to Microsoft: Windows Server Foundation Edition. Steve told Wall Street analysts about the software earlier today, Feb. 24. Twice a year, Microsoft gives Wall Street the big bear hugduring a July gathering at the Redmond campus and during winter in New York. The winter meeting lasted for about 75 minutes today. Steve told analysts:
From a revenue perspective, we are introducing a new low-cost, low-price, low-functionality Windows Server SKU. If you take a look at it, as server prices, hardware prices have come down, we don't exactly have a netbook phenomenon. But if somebody can buy a $500 server, they're a little loth to spend $500 for the server operating system that goes with it. So we have something that's akin to [a] netbook at the server level, and we'll be introducing our Foundation Edition over the next month or two.
Context explains Microsoft's objectives for Foundation Editionor so I interpret. Before and after introducing Foundation Edition, Steve spoke about the Web serving and hosting market:
Linux still dominates Web and scientific computing workloads ... So for us, really investing to get after, in a technology sense and in a business sense, Web, Web hosting, Web applications and scientific applications has been a major point of investment ... The hosting space, we have low share. We have some things we think we need to adjust in our pricing that will be important, but it probably is to the revenue or the share upside, but it's notit's a price decrease, if you will.
So I must assume that this "low-functionality" version of Windows Server will be for Web serving, but perhaps more. Windows Server comes with about a dozen-and-a-half preconfigured roles, with Web serving being just one. There are still a few scenarios in which servers are deployed for specific tasks, like Web serving or file and print, that require limited functionality and for which Linux would be a compelling lower-cost alternative to Windows Server. Server roles are good, but Microsoft could still notch down the functionality and price for single-function servers.
This is going to be important for Microsoft during these economic hard times. About two-thirds of its Server and Tools division revenue comes through annuity licensing. The other third comes from server hardware sales, which analysts say are slowing. Steve should be concerned about low-cost server sales picking up, but possibly with IT organizations picking up Linux instead.
I chuckled at the Foundation Edition nomenclature, wondering why Microsoft recycles these product names. Anybody recall Microsoft TV Foundation Edition? Microsoft now calls its TV platform Mediaroom.
Windows Server Foundation Edition isn't enough to give all those PR folks heart failure. There was more product disclosure. Steve told financial analysts:
Windows, Windows Mobile, and those two will become I'd say closer in many ways. There's still a real distinction between what's a phone and what's a PC. And yet the amount of technology that can be shared across that border continues to go up ... I actually showed you the union of Windows and Windows Mobile, compared to Apple, compared to RIM, because I think that's the right way to think about it, that's the way we think about it. There will be really shared technology across Windows and Windows Mobile.
Steve didn't exactly say there will be one operating system for PCs and handsets, but did he have to? "We've got Windows Mobile 7 coming next year," he said, reaffirming release time frame. By the way, I presume next year is 2010, but Steve was speaking to financial analysts and Microsoft's new fiscal year starts July 1. That could put release sooner rather than later.
The other bit of news definitely could send some PR folks into cardiac arrest: "The next big innovation milestone is Office 14, our next Office release, which will not be this year," Steve said.
There are plenty of implications in that news, for example, for businesses that bought Office 2007 annuity contracts in 2006 expecting that Microsoft would release the new version within three years. Many of those contracts will expire this year, putting some businesses in a buying quandary and quite possibly leading some IT organizations to not renew their contracts.
Something else: Steve didn't say Office 14 would ship next year, just not this year. No one should bet on 2010, yet.
[Please send your tips or rumors to watchtips at live.com.]


Comments (10)
It's the sequel of all sequels - The Third Foundation trilogy
Watch out for Foundation Client (a Windows 2.0 reprieve), Foundation Mobile (only works on analogue cellphones)
Apologies to Isaac
Posted by RightPaddock | February 24, 2009 7:06 PM
Watch out.. now RIAA will have to take microsoft to court for ripping off Asimov (or whomever own his name now).
Posted by Daz from downunder | February 24, 2009 7:23 PM
Why pay money for a limited-functionality product when Linux offers essentially unlimited function for free?
I can see the mobs rushing to knock down Microsoft's doors right now...
Posted by Lawrence D'Oliveiro | February 24, 2009 9:08 PM
"So we have something that's akin to [a] netbook at the server level"
So if they had to pull XP from the grave to shove it into a netbook. What did they do now? Repackage Windows 2000 Server?
Posted by Gerardo Tasistro | February 25, 2009 2:06 AM
To Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Completely agree with you. How can you beat free even with a cheap product? And what about the functionality of this server? It's kind of funny to pay for something crippled when you can have a full feature server like FreeBSD just one click away!!
Posted by Dimitrios | February 25, 2009 4:29 AM
This must be aimed at home-server type products, there's no way someone would run a business on this rubbish.
Posted by billybob | February 25, 2009 6:56 AM
Fantastic: Windows Foundation Server: a server with no services.
If you can afford a $500 server and don't want to waste money, install Linux or one of the BSDs instead (no, I don't mean a Microsoft BSoD). That way you get all the benefits of UNIX and the multitudinous free server software. You may even be able to buy a few more $500 servers with the money you don't waste on Ballmer.
Posted by Anonymouse | February 25, 2009 7:40 AM
I guess the part that give the marketing and sales types heart attacks is how these sort of announcements can freeze the market. If I was a small or medium sized business about to buy new servers, I would probably hold off to see if the forthcoming Foundation Edition meets my needs.
So short term we have people putting buying decisions on hold to wait to see if it does what they want (after all most people only use a small subset of available features). A few others will be pushed over the edge to Linux to avoid the Windows Edition confusion (ie it will do whatever they want without hitting an edition wall).
Longer term more MS customers will move down the Server line, diluting revenue MS receives here.
I guess the message from Balmer here is to sell MS stock because sales revenue will be going down either way.
Posted by smist08 | February 25, 2009 11:16 AM
Speaking about Servers
http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-3751981.php
Quote:
Marvell announced today a new type of computer. It's about the size of an AC to DC converting wall outlet plug, but is really a full SoC with a 1200 MHz CPU, built-in 512 MB Flash, 512 MB DRAM, Gigabit Ethernet and USB 2.0 support. It runs small versions of Linux, consumes about 5 watts max while allowing remote users (presumably those authorized by the owner) to access data stored on the device from remote locations including local intranets or over the Internet. The $49 device opens up a wide array of extremely low-power, low-volume, always on applications.
Posted by Marco | February 25, 2009 1:16 PM
Do you think that perhaps the name "Foundation Edition" somehow implies it has something to do with cement shoes?
That's what keeps popping to mind whenever I re-read the title of this particular blog entry.
Posted by Philosopher | February 25, 2009 1:52 PM