PC Software's Great Year
|
The year 2007 revived sagging U.S. retail PC software sales, with Office 2007 and Windows Vista providing significant uplift. |
Chris Swenson, NPD's director of software industry analysis, described a "perfect storm of new product releases in 2007." NPD's sales figures account for in-store and online sales for 2007 through the end of October.
The revival is a remarkable turnabout from sales since the turn of the millennium. "The compound annual growth rate [CAGR] for all of PC software from 2000-2006 was -0.5 percent a year in terms of dollar volume growth," Swenson said. "In other words, dollar volume has been flat for several years now. The fact that we're having close to double-digit dollar volume growth is a big, big deal. Retailers are ecstatic."
The big sales driver: Office 2007, which is selling like gangbusters. When comparing Office 2007 sales to version 2003 during the same early sales period, unit sales of the newer productivity suite are about double the older one, according to NPD.
"Office commands 17.4 percent of all PC software dollar volume, including PC games," Swenson said. "When people go to the store to buy software, there's a good chance they'll end up buying Microsoft Office."
The category with biggest year-over-year growth change and highest average selling price is operating systems. There, Windows Vista overwhelming leads the category, which is up nearly 50 percent from 2007. Vista's sales pull is surprising considering lackluster sales comparisons to Windows XP.
"Although shrink-wrapped Windows Vista is selling below shrink-wrapped XP levels in U.S. retail at the same point after its release many years ago, year-over-year retail sales of Windows are up significantly over 2006," Swenson said. He attributed some of the large growth rate to the "sawtooth" effect. "We were at the bottom up of the XP sawtooth last year."

Through October, Windows dollar volume share in the operating system category is 78.2 percent. Mac OS X dollar volume share is 21.3 percent and Linux is 0.5 percent.
"I think the reason why Microsoft's shrink-wrapped OS share isn't larger goes back to the discussion of why people aren't buying more boxed Vista," Swenson said. "Vista's more stringent hardware requirements and the relative lower price for a new PC that ships with Vistaeven if it is only Vista Basic."
Even ahead of Vista's launch, Microsoft executives predicted that the operating system's retail sales would be much larger on new PCs than boxed copies.
Swenson took a moment to identify what he believes is an untapped retail Linux opportunity, particularly with Windows sales being stronger on new PCs. "It's interesting that the most consumer-friendly Linux [distribution] out there, Ubuntu, has pretty much written off the retail channel." Granted, it's free. But "there's potential for a low-priced Ubuntu SKU," he said.
Shelf space would help compensate for the lack of advertising and raise awareness for Dell and Panasonic PCs preloaded with Ubuntu, he emphasized.
While Microsoft released products driving sales in the most successful categoriesbusiness applications and operating systemsother developers contributed to the "perfect storm."
Swenson described Adobe's Creative Suite 3 as a "huge success story." CS3 unit sales are up more than 80 percent compared to its predecessor during the comparable sales period.
In similar category, Apple's Final Cut Studio risk paid off. Apple eliminated individual SKUs, compelling buyers to purchase the full Studio to get Final Cut. "As a result, not only Studio sales are up, but Final Cut Express sales are up as well," Swenson said. "It looks like a successful decision by Apple. Sometimes decisions like that backfire."
A common thread ties together all four products: Creative Suite 3, Final Cut Studio 2, Office 2007 and Windows Vista. Adobe, Apple and Microsoft all introduced higher-priced versions, andwith CS3, Office 2007 and Vistamore SKUs. The three companies successfully defied the trend of lower average selling prices by offering higher-priced SKUs.
Another trend is worth noting. It's implications are important for Microsoft's "Games for Windows" push and its software plus services strategy. By the numbers, the PC games category is down about 4 percent year over year. However, "our consumer tracker and surveys show that more money is actually being spent on games if you include subscriptions," Swenson said.
No matter how perfect, all storms come to an end.
"Given the product release cycles, I'm expecting a down year in 2008." Swenson said. "Just the natural ebb and flow, not a decision [on the part of consumers] to pull back on software spending per se."


Comments (10)
Now all the Anti-MS propagandist going to start saying "its because of their Monopoly forcing their OS on everyone". This is a tired arguement.
When the average consumer is looking for a PC, they want an OS and some software installed. What options do consumer have: they can't get MAC OS installed on a PC because Apple doesn't license it (they want you to buy their expensive hardware). Linux, is it MS fault that Linux Distro don't adverstise their stuff to inform the consumer (so many different companys, consumers don't feel that they will be around for long).
If a person wants XP, the downgrade CD is free. A monopoly is when there's no viable alternative. If you don't like Vista or Windows, then don't buy it.
Would you buy a car without an engine, no! Can you buy a Prius with a V8, no! If you don't like what's running it, then you buy the model that does, not the other way around.
Posted by mailbox01 | November 20, 2007 5:20 PM
Microsoft propaganda! Vista is only around because of hardware resellers. If people had an obvious choice they would choose XP, not vista. I am in the industry, I don't choose MS anything if I can help it!
Posted by yo | November 20, 2007 7:10 PM
Windows propoganda? people only use windows for one reason, everyone else usses it. It is tradition and habit now to run windows.
The big problem is with office/works. Why would I give away a copy of open office (or at a small fee) when I can sell them office/works and make a heck of a lot more money. Face it. The majority of people are stupuid and lazy. They do not care about better or cheaper versions, even if they provide a better experience. They just want it now.
Posted by fee fi fo fum | November 20, 2007 8:54 PM
Why even include Linux retail sales? Mpst distributions are free, especially the most popular ones. How can you expect to get a significant market share of sales when the software is free?
A more important number would be the Linux "market share" of users, or the share of installed servers.
So does Linux have only 0.5 market share? Maybe in retail sales dollars. But what about its share of the installed base? Now that's a different story, and one that is very difficult to determine since there are no hard "sales" figures to use.
Still, Red Hat makes money on Linux. IBM still pushes Linux since it adds value to their other products and services. Many companies profit from supporting Linux.
Posted by Maddog | November 20, 2007 11:43 PM
Perhaps including a free alternative in the comparison of expensive (over-priced) OS's is to make Linux appear as a weak performer.
Apples and oranges, y'all.
Posted by Maddog's right !! | November 21, 2007 9:00 AM
Anti-MS propagandist ?
No need as it is fact that Vista is not selling. As stated the retail computers come with Vista, meaning only computer sales are up as most if not all will run home to install XP over Vista.
Fact is too like it or not, many Linux users buy new computers, they don't keep Vista for sure but Microsoft counts the sales right on though.
Anti-MS propagandist ?, no need for it the facts say it all.
Posted by RE: the Anti-MS propagandist | November 21, 2007 10:49 AM
Maddog's wrong !! :
At the outset the word free when talking about Linux means freedom, not free of charge. Fact, IBM sells lots of hardware (over about 5 years) with RedHat or Suse on them that customers pay for. What Maddog is talking about is all the free downloads of Linux etc, that is for development and testing and includes livecd distros.
Who gives a damn about sales anyway, fact is not even Microsoft knows how many are really using Linux and it does not matter if anyone does. Sales is not how it works, Linux has no real dependence on retail so it would follow that no sales numbers would be available.
Posted by RE: Maddog's right !! : | November 21, 2007 11:07 AM
With many businesses intending to abandon Windows for alternative Operating Systems, perhaps this post and the words of Steve Ballmer, that the future is about advertising for M$, has some meaning;
Gates responds to questions about his stock sales
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/125844.asp
Posted by chips | November 23, 2007 7:09 PM
Google Adsense ads (pay per click and pay per impression advertising) Donations (via PayPal or snail mail-- yes, some people do mail a check) Text Link Ads (sold for a fixed amount per month) Chitika eMiniMalls ads (pay per click) Affiliate programs like Amazon and (commission on products sold, mostly books) Advertising sold to individual advertisers (three-
Posted by #1 Home Business Idea | April 8, 2008 5:00 PM
PLR articles is another method of marketing your products through outsourcing
Posted by PLR - Private Label Article Packs | April 16, 2008 8:26 PM