Microsoft Looks to 64-Bit Future
|
During a speech this morning, Bill Laing, general manager of the Windows Server division, reiterated that, after 2008, Microsoft would only produce 64-bit operating systems. Windows Server 2008 will be Microsoft's last 32-bit OS. |
Laing spoke during the second day of Microsoft's Windows Hardware Engineering Conference.
The future has been an ongoing theme among the WinHEC keynotes. In talking about the future, Microsoft is telling its customers and hardware, software and channel partners where it will take the technology in the 2009-2010 release cycleand somewhat in the meantime.
The move to 64-bit has been much shakier than from 16-bit to 32-bit. The transition is slowest on the desktop, where driver and application support is an impediment. On the server, Microsoft offers mixed 32-bit and 64-bit products, with mixed acceptance. But Laing made clear that many new Microsoft server products would only be 64-bit.
If Laing meant what he said and how he said it, Windows Vista would be Microsoft's last 32-bit desktop operating system. Yes, there is a 64-bit version of Vista, but the future would be only 64-bit.
The 64-bit transition is something Microsoft partnerswhether they be channel, hardware or softwareneed to prepare for now. If the successors of Vista and Windows Server 2008 are to be only 64-bit, enterprises need to plan at what point, in the fairly near future, they are going to go 64-bit, whether Windows XP, Vista or Server.
But there's a chicken-and-egg problem, more for the desktop than server. Microsoft partners don't have much incentive to develop software applications and hardware drivers until there is a certain threshold of adoption; similarly, businesses resist moving to a new operating system if there aren't supporting applications and drivers. Corporate resistance to Vista is example of the latter problem.
During WinHEC 2005, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates said the transition to 64-bit would happen "rapidly." Two years later, that's clearly not the case on the desktop.
Microsoft's forward view isn't just 64-bit. Executives at WinHEC also spoke about virtualization and chip development, particularly advancement of multi-core processors.
During his keynote yesterday, Craig Mundie, Microsoft's chief research and strategy officer, spoke about Moore's Law and the law of physics, which limits how many transistors can fit on one chip.
"The hardware community is going to have to think about how to build machines that have a lot more parallelism in them, that have two cores, eight cores, and ultimately many, many cores, and, in fact, the cores will become heterogeneous from an architectural standpoint," he said.
Laing reiterated the importance of multi-core processing during his keynote this morningand that's something here today, he emphasized.
As I said in the previous post, Microsoft does give some direction to its partners about its future technology direction. Are you listening?
Related Posts:
- Is Vista One Step Ahead? , Microsoft Watch, May 16, 2007
- Longhorn Named Windows Server 2008, Microsoft Watch, May 15, 2007
- What's Inside Windows Server Longhorn, Microsoft Watch, April 30, 2007
- Vista Virtualization Goes Back to the Future, Microsoft Watch, April 2, 2007


Comments (6)
Joe , someone must drive the direction or the crowd will be having separate ways.
In this case, just happens that Microsoft "gives soem directions to its partners".
What is wrong about this ?
What evil has Microsoft done ?
Posted by Eder | May 17, 2007 5:19 AM
I don't see that Microsoft have done any evil in this article and I don't think Joe was trying to portray that they have, are you paranoid, I wonder?
Posted by The recursion king | May 18, 2007 9:09 AM
Joe Wilcox wrote:" If the successors of Vista and Windows Server 2008 are to be only 64-bit, enterprises need to plan at what point, in the fairly near future, they are going to go 64-bit, whether Windows XP, Vista or Server."
There is another option, GNU/Linux... There are many 32 bit servers out there for SMB and other small organisations that spit out a static page or whatever. They are likely to go to hosting on another machine, which will likely be 64bit, or they could simply load up Linux like they have been doing on gateways and the like. No need to change the hardware.
This could give a pop to Linux on the server.
Posted by Robert Pogson | May 18, 2007 9:36 AM
"The move to 64-bit has been much shakier than from 16-bit to 32-bit. The transition is slowest on the desktop, where driver and application support is an impediment."
Maybe on Windows, linux Iam running a 64bit kernel, using a modern laptop and it is faster then any Windows I have owned. Drivers for 64bit Windows will share the lack with linux, not all oems moving very fast on 64bit.
Posted by Jackolan | May 18, 2007 4:43 PM
"The move to 64-bit has been much shakier than from 16-bit to 32-bit. The transition is slowest on the desktop, where driver and application support is an impediment."
Maybe on Windows, linux Iam running a 64bit kernel, using a modern laptop and it is faster then any Windows I have owned. Drivers for 64bit Windows will share the lack with linux, not all oems moving very fast on 64bit.
Posted by Jackolan | May 18, 2007 4:44 PM
I have had a 64 bit desktop machine for almost a year now and I really like it. However, listening to MS talk about the 64 bit future isn't very reassuring. They are constantly forgetting 64 bit support when they bring out new programs.
The 64 bit IE7 is not supported when accessing the Microsoft update site. 32 bit only.
The new home server software that is in Beta testing right now, I signed up for, downloaded the program only to find out it didn't support a 64 bit desktop computer on the network.
So much for MS and it's grandiose plans for 64 bit computing.
Richard
Posted by Richard | May 21, 2007 7:24 PM